Gulliver 32
0.65
UTI
0.58
CN
0.89
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.58 Moderately populated
- Cdens 0.89 Dense
- CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 32 is a moderately populated, dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 98.383 | 7.478 | 0.558 | -0.95 | 2.284 | 40.902 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 98.38 | 7.499 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 98.384 | 7.466 | 0.56 | -0.947 | 2.281 | 40.781 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 98.384 | 7.494 | 0.567 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 98.384 | 7.466 | 0.56 | -0.947 | 2.281 | 40.781 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 98.388 | 7.5 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 98.38 | 7.499 | 0.589 | -0.909 | 2.32 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 98.383 | 7.478 | 0.577 | -0.879 | 2.304 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 98.383 | 7.478 | 0.577 | -0.879 | 2.304 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 98.383 | 7.478 | â | â | â | 2.439 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 98.383 | 7.478 | â | â | â | 40.24 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 98.383 | 7.478 | 0.577 | -0.879 | 2.304 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.67 | 1.64 | â | 340 | â | 179 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 236* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.85 | 1.16 | â | 468 | 0.400 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.67 | 0.98 | 1.74 | 460 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.63 | 1.55 | â | 546 | -0.164 | 181* | 0.52 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.67 | 1.64 | â | 340 | -0.166 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.69 | 0.73 | â | 1288 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.39 | 0.79 | â | 713 | 0.032 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.