Gulliver 32

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.65 UTI
0.58
CN
0.89
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.65
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 7.4 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.58 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.89 Dense
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 32 is a moderately populated, dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 98.383 7.478 0.558 -0.95 2.284 40.902
Almeida et al. 2025 98.38 7.499 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 98.384 7.466 0.56 -0.947 2.281 40.781
Cavallo et al. 2024 98.384 7.494 0.567 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 98.384 7.466 0.56 -0.947 2.281 40.781
Almeida et al. 2023 98.388 7.5 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 98.38 7.499 0.589 -0.909 2.32 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 98.383 7.478 0.577 -0.879 2.304 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 98.383 7.478 0.577 -0.879 2.304 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 98.383 7.478 – – – 2.439
Soubiran et al. 2018 98.383 7.478 – – – 40.24
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 98.383 7.478 0.577 -0.879 2.304 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 1.67 1.64 – 340 – 179 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 236* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.85 1.16 – 468 0.400 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.67 0.98 1.74 460 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.63 1.55 – 546 -0.164 181* 0.52 –
Dias et al. 2021 1.67 1.64 – 340 -0.166 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.69 0.73 – 1288 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.65 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.39 0.79 – 713 0.032 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.65 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.65 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸