Gulliver 30
0.76
UTI
0.6
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.6
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.6 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.6 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Gulliver 30 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 313.658 | 45.999 | 0.448 | -2.526 | -3.695 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 313.654 | 45.985 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 313.682 | 45.998 | 0.445 | -2.555 | -3.724 | -42.183 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 313.652 | 45.992 | 0.448 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 313.682 | 45.998 | 0.445 | -2.555 | -3.724 | -42.183 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 313.654 | 45.985 | 0.435 | -2.529 | -3.696 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 313.673 | 45.996 | 0.427 | -2.524 | -3.697 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 313.673 | 45.996 | 0.427 | -2.524 | -3.697 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 313.673 | 45.996 | â | â | â | 2.775 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 313.673 | 45.996 | â | â | â | -10.2 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 313.673 | 45.996 | 0.427 | -2.524 | -3.697 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.03 | 1.96 | â | 197 | â | 280 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 370* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.20 | 2.06 | â | 102 | 0.110 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.10 | 1.63 | 1.66 | 175 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.03 | 1.96 | â | 197 | -0.048 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.27 | 1.37 | â | 151 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.97 | 1.67 | â | 34 | 0.007 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.19 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.