Gulliver 26

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.48 UTI
0.76
CN
0.47
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.45
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%) 131
Core radius and density 2.5 [pc], 2.4 [pc-2]
C3 classification CC
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 0.47 Loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.45 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique
đŸ“Ĩ Members 📊 Colab đŸ”Ŧ Bayestar19 MOCAMOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (Îą, δ) 🔍 Simbad (Îą, δ)

Overview
ℹī¸
Gulliver 26 is a rich, loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2099, e_all=0.0348.

Data
🔍 Search references for Gulliver 26 in: SciX Simbad
ℹī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 80.681 35.273 0.376 1.851 -2.856 14.269
Li et al. 2025 80.689 35.27 0.36 2.018 -2.874 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 80.682 35.271 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 80.705 35.277 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 80.688 35.274 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 80.688 35.274 0.364 1.852 -2.846 32.376
Cavallo et al. 2024 80.682 35.271 0.359 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 80.688 35.274 0.364 1.852 -2.846 32.376
Almeida et al. 2023 80.686 35.276 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 80.689 35.27 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 80.705 35.277 0.359 2.05 -2.904 2.559
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 80.689 35.27 0.36 2.018 -2.874 –
Zhong et al. 2020 80.689 35.27 – 2.018 -2.874 20.234
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 80.689 35.27 0.36 2.018 -2.874 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 80.689 35.27 – – – 2.424
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 80.689 35.27 0.36 2.018 -2.874 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.55 1.88 1.28 380 -0.125 396 0.65 0
Li et al. 2025 2.26 1.70 – 686 -0.127 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.280(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.55 2.22 – 33 – 403 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.205(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.43 1.88 1.28 396 – 625(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.30 1.53 – 776 0.420 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.43 1.88 1.28 395 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.44 2.12 – 468 -0.123 357(1) 0.65 –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.67 1.62 – 380 – 389 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.55 2.22 – 33 -0.024 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.67 1.62 – 380 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.99 2.40 – 166 – – – –
Zhong et al. 2020 2.57(1) – – – -0.197 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.57 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 2.34 2.30 – 175 0.002 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.57 – – – – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
HXWHB 7 6.9 80.64 35.32 0.55 1.54 -2.87 5.9 0.02

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Gulliver 26 shares with each listed object.

Visualization
ℹī¸
Gulliver 26 UCC
Gulliver 26 HUNT23
Gulliver 26 CANTAT20
Galactocentric position diagram