Gulliver 2

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.79 UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.4 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.78 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Gulliver 2 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 122.889 -37.4 0.725 -4.917 4.633 14.934
Li et al. 2025 122.883 -37.404 0.696 -4.951 4.576 –
Wei et al. 2025 122.911 -37.454 0.761 -4.467 4.31 –
Almeida et al. 2025 122.874 -37.421 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 122.895 -37.393 0.714 -4.886 4.626 8.096
Celli et al. 2024 122.883 -37.404 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 122.899 -37.407 0.72 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 122.895 -37.393 0.714 -4.886 4.626 8.096
Dias et al. 2021 122.874 -37.421 0.703 -4.969 4.549 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 122.883 -37.404 0.696 -4.951 4.576 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 122.883 -37.404 0.696 -4.951 4.576 –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 122.883 -37.404 – – – 2.382
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 122.883 -37.404 0.696 -4.951 4.576 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.08 0.81 – 10 -0.267 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 1.32 1.04 – 6 -0.250 971 0.42 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.36 1.03 – 9 – 267 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 534* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 7 – 230 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.31 1.03 – 6 -0.220 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.32 0.95 1.67 5 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.36 1.03 – 9 -0.038 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.37 0.51 – 7 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.38 – – – – – – –
Monteiro & Dias 2019 1.53 1.02 – 7 0.013 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.38 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸