Gulliver 14

0.56 UTI

0.57

C_N

0.3

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.45

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 65

Core radius and density 2.1 [pc], 1.5 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.57 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.3 Loose
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.45 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 14 is a moderately populated, loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.5336, e_all=0.1884.

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 14 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	259.925	-36.742	0.763	-3.761	-4.79	-15.558
Li et al.	2025	259.928	-36.785	0.745	-3.719	-4.792	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	259.928	-36.738	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	259.915	-36.763	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	259.946	-36.708	0.763	-3.759	-4.756	-16.263
Cavallo et al.	2024	259.928	-36.738	0.76	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	259.946	-36.708	0.763	-3.759	-4.756	-16.263
Almeida et al.	2023	259.899	-36.805	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	259.956	-36.702	0.748	-3.751	-4.795	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	259.928	-36.785	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	259.915	-36.763	0.741	-3.733	-4.779	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	259.928	-36.785	0.745	-3.719	-4.792	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	259.928	-36.785	0.745	-3.719	-4.792	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	259.928	-36.785	–	–	–	2.4
Soubiran et al.	2018	259.928	-36.785	–	–	–	-13.36
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	259.928	-36.785	0.745	-3.719	-4.792	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.24	1.87	0.99	536	0.058	176	0.57	0
Li et al.	2025	1.01	1.68	–	709	-0.048	–	–	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.080⁽⁵⁾	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.26	2.00	–	343	–	173	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.24	1.93	0.99	394	–	316⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.14	1.81	–	832	0.090	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.24	1.93	0.99	394	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.19	1.87	–	470	0.201	170⁽¹⁾	0.57	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.20	–	–	661	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	1.25	1.63	–	603	–	178	–	0⁽¹⁾
Dias et al.	2021	1.26	2.00	–	343	0.170	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.25	1.63	–	603	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	1.21	2.42	–	107	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.29	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	1.19	1.50	–	673	0.026	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.29	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.29	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3