Gulliver 10

0.72 UTI

0.76

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.42

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 117

Core radius and density 1.5 [pc], 5.6 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.76 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.42 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 10 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, age, and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as primordial binary cluster 68 along with CWNU_338.

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G62, along with Theia_472 and CWNU_338.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.88 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.88 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.3953, e_all=0.3257.

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 10 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	123.107	-38.647	1.667	-4.39	5.052	25.37
Almeida et al.	2025	123.024	-38.659	–	–	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	124.148	-38.718	1.612	-4.947	5.21	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	123.134	-38.712	1.684	-4.364	5.09	27.621
Celli et al.	2024	123.09	-38.676	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	123.168	-38.687	1.682	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	123.134	-38.712	1.684	-4.364	5.09	27.621
He et al.	2022	123.153	-38.675	1.695	-4.321	5.076	–
Dias et al.	2021	123.024	-38.659	1.661	-4.428	4.948	33.422
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	123.09	-38.676	1.652	-4.443	4.965	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	123.09	-38.676	1.652	-4.443	4.965	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	123.09	-38.676	–	–	–	2.154
Soubiran et al.	2018	123.09	-38.676	–	–	–	32.64
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	123.09	-38.676	1.652	-4.443	4.965	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.59	1.87	2.12	10	0.134	79	–	–
Liu et al.	2025	0.86	0.49	–	13	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	0.52	0.34	–	13	–	57	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	0.61	0.62	–	11	0.134	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	0.57	2.25	2.12	5	–	89⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	9	–	79	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	0.86	1.87	–	309	0.710	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	0.57	2.25	2.12	5	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	2.00	–	6	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	0.52	0.34	–	13	0.134	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	0.61	0.62	–	9	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	0.59	2.40	–	21	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	0.59	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	0.57	1.91	–	7	0.006	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	0.59	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	0.59	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3