Gulliver 1

(FoF 404)

0.59 UTI

0.79

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.39

C_lit

0.88

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 217

Core radius and density 1.9 [pc], 5.1 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.79 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.39 Poorly studied
C_dup 0.88 Very likely unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Gulliver 1 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Note: This is very likely a unique object, which shares a small percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Old Contains BSS

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2667, e_all=0.1897.

Rain et al. (2021)
This cluster was not include in (Dias et al., 2002A&A...389..871D, Cat. B/ocl), parameters log(t)=9.13, E(B-V)=0.220 and Z=0.016 are from Monteiro & Dias (2019MNRAS.487.2385M).

Data

🔍 Search references for Gulliver 1 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	161.586	-57.039	0.33	-7.955	3.607	-20.892
Li et al.	2025	161.582	-57.034	0.323	-7.926	3.582	–
Almeida et al.	2025	161.58	-57.029	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	161.588	-57.024	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	161.582	-57.034	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	161.582	-57.034	0.323	-7.926	3.582	–
Dias et al.	2021	161.58	-57.029	0.327	-7.92	3.59	-17.606
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	161.582	-57.034	0.323	-7.926	3.582	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	161.582	-57.034	0.323	-7.926	3.582	–
Liu & Pang	2019	161.607	-57.047	0.322	-7.754	3.485	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	161.582	-57.034	–	–	–	2.539
Bossini et al.	2019	161.582	-57.034	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	161.582	-57.034	–	–	–	-20.68
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	161.582	-57.034	0.323	-7.926	3.582	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	2.73	0.75	–	1349	-0.017	637	0.6	2
Li et al.	2025	2.69	0.93	–	1345	-0.235	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	2.72	0.81	–	1321	–	329	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	2.58	0.91	–	1324	-0.033	885⁽¹⁾	0.60	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	2.73	0.30	–	1380	–	637	–	1⁽¹⁾
Rain et al.	2021	2.84	0.69	–	1349	–	–	–	3
Dias et al.	2021	2.72	0.81	–	1321	0.009	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.73	0.30	–	1380	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	2.92	0.84	–	776	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.84	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	2040	-0.750	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	2.76	0.69	–	1352	0.016	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	2.58	0.50	–	1422	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	2.84	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.84	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster	%	RA	DEC	Plx	pmRA	pmDE	Rv	UTI
ASCC 61	11.5	161.54	-56.96	0.34	-7.97	3.61	-20.89	0.39

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Gulliver 1 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2