Graham 1

0.61 UTI

0.0

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.65

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 23

Radius (P>50% members) 1.3 [arcmin]

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.65 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Graham 1 is a sparse, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Data

🔍 Search references for Graham 1 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	164.134	-63.008	0.265	-6.261	2.178	47.507
Almeida et al.	2025	164.148	-63.017	–	–	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	164.134	-63.018	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	164.148	-63.017	0.222	-6.338	2.148	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	164.134	-63.018	0.218	-6.324	2.178	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	164.133	-63.018	–	-6.536	2.048	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	164.134	-63.018	0.218	-6.324	2.178	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	164.134	-63.018	–	-6.303	2.164	2.598
Soubiran et al.	2018	164.134	-63.018	–	–	–	3.88
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	164.134	-63.018	0.218	-6.324	2.178	–
Dias et al.	2014	164.133	-63.018	–	-3.17	1.91	–
Dias et al.	2002	164.133	-63.018	–	-6.99	4.89	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Almeida et al.	2025	3.65	2.21	–	6	–	153	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	16	–	262	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	3.65	2.21	–	6	-0.003	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.56	2.29	–	15	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	4.06	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Monteiro & Dias	2019	4.94	2.12	–	8	0.039	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	4.06	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	4.06	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	3.60	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2