FSR 1144

(MWSC 1031; FoF 731)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.85 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.87
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 23.3 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.87 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
FSR 1144 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 104.297 -6.631 0.496 -1.295 1.122 15.593
Li et al. 2025 104.298 -6.628 0.512 -1.28 1.144 –
Almeida et al. 2025 104.303 -6.625 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 104.302 -6.626 0.483 -1.286 1.127 15.597
Cavallo et al. 2024 104.307 -6.641 0.487 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 104.302 -6.626 0.483 -1.286 1.127 15.597
Almeida et al. 2023 104.303 -6.638 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 104.31 -6.635 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 104.303 -6.625 0.514 -1.283 1.114 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 104.298 -6.628 0.512 -1.28 1.144 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 104.298 -6.628 0.512 -1.28 1.144 –
Liu & Pang 2019 104.296 -6.647 0.496 -1.27 1.059 –
Bossini et al. 2019 104.298 -6.628 – – – –
Bica et al. 2019 104.321 -6.62 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 104.298 -6.628 0.512 -1.28 1.144 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 104.31 -6.635 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 104.316 -6.637 – 0.84 0.81 –
Froebrich et al. 2007 104.317 -6.62 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 104.317 -6.62 – 0.84 0.81 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.79 0.92 1.01 151 -0.106 304 0.51 –
Li et al. 2025 1.73 0.75 – 367 -0.238 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.76 0.94 – 174 – 301 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 426(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.09 0.92 – 93 0.170 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.87 0.69 1.01 132 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.79 0.88 – 180 -0.095 308(1) 0.51 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 151 – 86 – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.76 0.94 – 174 -0.117 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.81 0.66 – 65 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.85 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 22 -1.000 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 2.11 0.85 – 41 0.000 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.85 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.74 0.97 – 151 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.74 0.97 – 151 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.74 0.97 – 151 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸