FSR 1063

(SAI 66; MWSC 917)

0.89 UTI

0.68

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 86

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 17.0 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.68 Moderately populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

FSR 1063 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for FSR 1063 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	98.658	-0.261	0.414	0.022	-1.532	49.442
Li et al.	2025	98.654	-0.265	0.393	0.057	-1.541	–
Almeida et al.	2025	98.654	-0.26	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	98.655	-0.267	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	98.655	-0.267	0.408	0.01	-1.548	49.441
Cavallo et al.	2024	98.64	-0.243	0.407	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	98.655	-0.267	0.408	0.01	-1.548	49.441
Just et al.	2023	98.651	-0.266	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	98.654	-0.26	0.387	0.033	-1.522	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	98.654	-0.265	0.393	0.057	-1.541	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	98.658	-0.267	–	0.169	-1.538	–
Zhong et al.	2020	98.654	-0.265	–	0.057	-1.541	12.663
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	98.654	-0.265	0.393	0.057	-1.541	–
Bossini et al.	2019	98.654	-0.265	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	98.654	-0.265	–	–	–	59.76
Bica et al.	2019	98.658	-0.265	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	98.654	-0.265	0.393	0.057	-1.541	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	98.651	-0.266	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	98.658	-0.267	–	-0.66	-2.36	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	98.658	-0.267	–	2.96	0.15	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	98.658	-0.267	–	–	–	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	98.654	-0.265	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	98.658	-0.267	–	-0.66	-2.36	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	2.2	1.785	1.15	355	-0.058	247	–	–
Li et al.	2025	2.00	2.20	–	355	-0.163	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.89	2.19	–	187	–	247	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.496⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	402⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	2.37	2.21	–	214	0.460	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.20	2.07	1.15	167	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	724	–	242	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.89	2.19	–	187	-0.116	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.38	1.77	–	110	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	2.28	1.77	–	8403	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.37	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	2.28	1.77	–	253	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	2.37	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.37	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	2.03	1.55	–	724	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	2.03	1.55	–	724	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	1.97	1.80	–	398	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	2.03	1.55	–	724	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3