FSR 0948

(SAI 64; MWSC 867)

0.71 UTI

0.75

C_N

0.5

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.77

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 110

Core radius and density 2.2 [pc], 2.5 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.75 Rich
C_dens 0.5 Moderately dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.77 Well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

FSR 0948 is a rich, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1413, e_all=0.0791.

Data

🔍 Search references for FSR 0948 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	96.49	15.858	0.218	-0.152	0.053	52.077
Li et al.	2025	96.48	15.859	0.2	-0.132	0.051	–
Almeida et al.	2025	96.476	15.868	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	96.483	15.855	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	96.483	15.855	0.22	-0.151	0.046	44.467
Cavallo et al.	2024	96.481	15.863	0.22	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	96.483	15.855	0.22	-0.151	0.046	44.467
Almeida et al.	2023	96.479	15.865	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	96.46	15.861	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	96.48	15.859	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	96.476	15.868	0.202	-0.113	0.045	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	96.48	15.859	0.2	-0.132	0.051	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	96.471	15.861	–	-0.197	0.024	–
Zhong et al.	2020	96.48	15.859	–	-0.132	0.051	49.688
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	96.48	15.859	0.2	-0.132	0.051	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	96.48	15.859	–	–	–	49.22
Bica et al.	2019	96.495	15.855	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	96.48	15.859	0.2	-0.132	0.051	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-0.11	-2.13	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	96.471	15.861	–	0.55	-1.57	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	96.46	15.861	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	96.471	15.861	–	0.42	-0.94	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	96.468	15.86	–	-0.48	-4.27	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	96.483	15.861	–	–	–	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	96.496	15.852	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	96.471	15.861	–	0.42	-0.94	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	3.98	1.24	0.8	537	-0.198	374	0.59	0
Li et al.	2025	4.05	1.59	–	536	-0.032	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	3.42	1.77	–	494	–	374	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.226⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	3.98	1.18	0.80	487	–	596⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	3.63	1.90	–	275	-0.190	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	3.98	1.18	0.80	486	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	3.63	1.74	–	448	-0.205	351⁽¹⁾	0.59	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	603	–	340	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	4.09	1.24	–	537	–	409	–	0⁽¹⁾
Dias et al.	2021	3.42	1.77	–	494	-0.255	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	4.09	1.24	–	537	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	4.04	1.25	–	646	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	4.36⁽¹⁾	1.18	–	8780	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	4.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	4.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	4.36	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	2.99	1.18	–	603	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	2.99	1.18	–	603	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	2.33	0.25	–	1000	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	2.33	0.25	–	1000	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3