FSR 0932

(SAI 57; MWSC 719)

0.75 UTI

0.38

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.68

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 38

Core radius and density 0.5 [pc], 11 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.38 Poorly populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.68 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

FSR 0932 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.76 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.76 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1583, e_all=0.0911.

Data

🔍 Search references for FSR 0932 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	91.092	14.575	0.448	-0.442	-0.833	–
Almeida et al.	2025	91.087	14.581	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	91.094	14.575	0.458	-0.446	-0.843	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	91.08	14.569	0.458	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	91.094	14.575	0.458	-0.446	-0.843	–
Just et al.	2023	91.102	14.563	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	91.087	14.581	0.363	-0.3	-0.741	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	91.087	14.573	0.402	-0.36	-0.789	–
Zhong et al.	2020	91.087	14.573	–	-0.36	-0.789	29.24
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	91.087	14.573	0.402	-0.36	-0.789	–
Bica et al.	2019	91.095	14.575	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	91.087	14.573	0.402	-0.36	-0.789	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	1.16	-3.01	–
Dib et al.	2018	91.11	14.562	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	91.11	14.573	–	-0.528	-0.873	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	91.092	14.573	–	-3.66	-4.44	–
Joshi et al.	2016	91.11	14.562	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	91.102	14.563	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	91.092	14.573	–	-3.72	-3.01	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	91.11	14.562	–	-2.02	-1.61	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	91.09	14.573	–	–	–	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	91.1	14.562	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	91.092	14.573	–	-3.72	-3.01	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.99	2.685	1.97	538	0.000	276	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	2.00	3.02	–	68	–	276	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.99	3.26	1.97	71	–	496⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.82	3.11	–	69	0.350	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.99	3.26	1.97	71	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	1259	–	20	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	2.00	3.02	–	68	-0.142	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	2.34	2.82	–	117	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	3.39	3.32	–	234	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	2.32⁽¹⁾	2.03	–	9100	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	2.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	2.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.51	–	–	1259	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	2.82	2.55	–	282	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.51	2.03	–	1259	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.51	2.03	–	1259	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.51	2.03	–	1259	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	1.09	1.23	–	794	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.09	1.23	–	794	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3