FSR 0716

(SAI 44; MWSC 482)

0.90 UTI

0.85

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.94

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 368

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 10.4 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.85 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.94 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

FSR 0716 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Data

🔍 Search references for FSR 0716 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	77.788	45.722	0.259	-0.265	-1.666	-8.656
Otto et al.	2026	77.793	45.723	–	-0.27	-1.63	7.7
Li et al.	2025	77.786	45.718	0.252	-0.265	-1.628	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	77.781	45.72	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	77.782	45.712	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	77.793	45.723	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	77.793	45.723	0.252	-0.323	-1.701	10.976
Cavallo et al.	2024	77.781	45.72	0.251	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	77.793	45.723	0.252	-0.323	-1.701	10.976
Almeida et al.	2023	77.791	45.712	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	77.786	45.718	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	77.782	45.712	0.249	-0.286	-1.636	–
Spina et al.	2021	77.785	45.718	0.254	-0.272	-1.624	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	77.786	45.718	0.252	-0.265	-1.628	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	77.792	45.713	–	-0.268	-1.623	–
Donor et al.	2020	77.787	45.715	–	-0.33	-1.77	20.8
Zhong et al.	2020	77.786	45.718	–	-0.265	-1.628	2.196
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	77.786	45.718	0.252	-0.265	-1.628	–
Bossini et al.	2019	77.786	45.718	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	77.786	45.718	–	–	–	11.18
Bica et al.	2019	77.785	45.721	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	77.786	45.718	0.252	-0.265	-1.628	–
Dias et al.	2014	77.792	45.713	–	3.21	-1.74	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	77.781	45.719	–	–	–	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	77.792	45.713	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	77.792	45.713	–	3.21	-1.74	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	3.56	1.06	0.92	897	-0.320	733	0.73	0
Otto et al.	2026	–	–	–	871	-0.340⁽¹⁵⁾	–	–	–
Li et al.	2025	3.53	1.21	–	1024	-0.363	–	–	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.270⁽⁵⁾	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	3.51	1.30	–	1021	–	637	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.197⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	840⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	2.79	1.05	–	1514	-0.360	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	3.60	0.72	0.92	897	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	3.36	1.15	–	1222	-0.262	513⁽¹⁾	0.73	–
Spina et al.	2022	–	–	–	–	-0.400	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	3.58	0.86	–	871	–	829	–	0⁽¹⁾
Dias et al.	2021	3.51	1.30	–	1021	-0.319	–	–	–
Spina et al.	2021	3.69	–	–	871	-0.321⁽²⁰⁾	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.58	0.86	–	871	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	3.53	1.04	–	977	–	–	–	–
Donor et al.	2020	–	–	–	–	-0.400	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	3.56⁽¹⁾	1.08	–	8868	-0.089	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	3.56	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	4.25	1.06	–	738	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	3.56	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	3.56	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	3.40	0.76	–	891	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	4.50	1.31	–	638	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3