FSR 0448

(MWSC 3756)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.69 UTI
0.75
CN
0.54
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.71
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.8 [pc], 2.7 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.75 Rich
  • Cdens 0.54 Moderately dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.71 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
FSR 0448 is a rich, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the distance parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as tidal capture (resonant trapping binary) 142 along with FSR_0451.

Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair P386, along with FSR_0451.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.0484, e_all=0.1305.

Piecka & Paunzen (2021)
Belongs to cluster aggregate 'Agg29' along with FSR 0451.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 356.801 60.898 0.318 -2.474 -2.084 -6.183
Hu & Soubiran 2025 356.819 60.905 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 356.814 60.898 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 356.806 60.897 0.326 -2.475 -2.099 12.167
Cavallo et al. 2024 356.819 60.905 0.325 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 356.806 60.897 0.326 -2.475 -2.099 12.167
Almeida et al. 2023 356.817 60.895 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 356.782 60.907 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 356.818 60.902 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 356.814 60.898 0.314 -2.475 -2.037 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 356.818 60.902 0.315 -2.49 -2.035 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 356.818 60.902 0.315 -2.49 -2.035 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 356.818 60.902 – – – -50.92
Bica et al. 2019 356.795 60.913 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 356.818 60.902 0.315 -2.49 -2.035 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -0.51 0.27 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 356.788 60.917 – -1.39 -1.8 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 356.782 60.907 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 356.788 60.917 – -0.72 -1.34 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 356.79 60.91 – 0.7 -3.26 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 356.79 60.91 – 0.7 -3.26 –
Froebrich et al. 2007 356.788 60.917 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 356.788 60.917 – -0.72 -1.34 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.84 3.15 2.19 355 0.002 519 0.7 0
Liu et al. 2025 10.62 1.14 – 269 – – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.110(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 3.11 2.95 – 658 – 432 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.81 3.20 2.19 339 – 832(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.84 3.37 – 550 0.150 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.81 3.20 2.19 339 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.69 3.10 – 740 -0.071 519(1) 0.70 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 355 – 321 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 3.22 2.83 – 389 – 527 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 3.11 2.95 – 658 0.074 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.22 2.83 – 389 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.83 2.92 – 490 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.91 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.91 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.91 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.01 3.94 – 355 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.01 3.94 – 355 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.01 3.94 – 355 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.01 3.94 – 355 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸