FoF 658
(LP 658)
0.78
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
FoF 658 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 95.267 | -3.453 | 0.674 | -1.484 | 1.6 | 23.585 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 95.274 | -3.431 | 0.673 | -1.458 | 1.613 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 95.275 | -3.453 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 95.263 | -3.405 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 95.272 | -3.468 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 95.272 | -3.468 | 0.677 | -1.488 | 1.619 | 22.77 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 95.275 | -3.453 | 0.677 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 95.272 | -3.468 | 0.677 | -1.488 | 1.619 | 22.77 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 95.304 | -3.395 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 95.263 | -3.487 | 0.668 | -1.489 | 1.579 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 95.263 | -3.405 | 0.675 | -1.472 | 1.601 | 27.375 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 95.274 | -3.431 | 0.673 | -1.458 | 1.613 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 95.244 | -3.415 | 0.67 | -1.495 | 1.579 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.47 | 0.61 | â | 992 | 0.052 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.220* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.36 | 0.79 | â | 1074 | â | 263 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.042* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 463* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.49 | 0.58 | â | 1096 | 0.290 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.40 | 0.29 | 0.53 | 1222 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.40 | 0.81 | â | 1030 | -0.103 | 420* | 0.38 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.49 | â | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.36 | 0.79 | â | 1074 | -0.119 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.53 | 0.59 | â | 933 | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 550 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.