FoF 5
(LP 5)
0.49
UTI
0.76
CN
0.17
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.26
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
130
Core radius and density
3.2 [pc], 0.8 [pc-2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 0.17 Very loose
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.26 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
FoF 5 is a rich, very loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 156.138 | -72.526 | 0.518 | -6.883 | 1.468 | -23.217 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 156.008 | -72.5 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 156.06 | -72.511 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 156.323 | -72.546 | 0.525 | -6.893 | 1.485 | -22.41 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 156.008 | -72.5 | 0.524 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 156.323 | -72.546 | 0.525 | -6.893 | 1.485 | -22.41 |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 156.138 | -72.51 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 156.06 | -72.511 | 0.515 | -6.887 | 1.468 | -22.954 |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 156.208 | -72.527 | 0.51 | -6.879 | 1.449 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 156.138 | -72.51 | 0.51 | -6.89 | 1.462 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 156.145 | -72.508 | 0.506 | -6.873 | 1.425 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.825 | 0.27 | 0.42 | 2570 | 0.002 | 967 | â | 5 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.250(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.78 | 0.33 | â | 2570 | â | 967 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 1.81 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 2324 | â | 337(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.84 | 0.27 | â | 1995 | 0.280 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.80 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 2323 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 1.84 | 0.27 | â | 2692 | â | 2459 | â | 5(1) |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.78 | 0.33 | â | 2570 | 0.004 | â | â | â |
| Spina et al. | 2021 | 1.96 | â | â | 2692 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.84 | 0.27 | â | 2692 | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 3160 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).