FoF 282
(LP 0282)
0.73
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.45
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
18.3 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.45 Poorly studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
FoF 282 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the distance, absorption, and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~2.81 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.95 kpc).
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 265.252 | -33.26 | 0.356 | -0.042 | -0.969 | 11.02 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 265.264 | -33.27 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 265.261 | -33.269 | 0.353 | -0.024 | -0.97 | 61.613 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 265.25 | -33.269 | 0.352 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 265.261 | -33.269 | 0.353 | -0.024 | -0.97 | 61.613 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 265.264 | -33.27 | 0.334 | -0.038 | -0.982 | 8.39 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 265.248 | -33.257 | 0.344 | -0.065 | -1.024 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 265.267 | -33.272 | 0.335 | -0.027 | -0.994 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.95 | 4.13 | 2.08 | 129 | 0.366 | 2216 | â | â |
| Liu et al. | 2025 | 9.77 | 1.61 | â | 98 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.95 | 4.13 | â | 160 | â | 1221 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3211(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.79 | 5.44 | â | 55 | -1.170 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.60 | 5.20 | 2.08 | 35 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.95 | 4.13 | â | 160 | 0.366 | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 692 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as tidal capture (resonant trapping binary) 151 along with NGC_6404.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.