ESO 392 13

(MWSC 2598)

0.52 UTI

0.4

C_N

0.42

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.39

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 40

Core radius and density 1.2 [pc], 2.1 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.4 Poorly populated
C_dens 0.42 Loose
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.39 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

ESO 392 13 is a poorly populated, loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G171, along with HSC_2918 and HSC_2916.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data

🔍 Search references for ESO 392 13 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	261.702	-34.717	0.924	1.649	-2.848	-26.58
Almeida et al.	2025	261.718	-34.702	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	261.683	-34.744	0.922	1.664	-2.84	-26.608
Cavallo et al.	2024	261.702	-34.721	0.922	–	–	–
He et al.	2023	261.691	-34.73	0.927	1.648	-2.843	-55.78
Hunt & Reffert	2023	261.683	-34.744	0.922	1.664	-2.84	-26.608
Just et al.	2023	261.708	-34.683	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	261.718	-34.702	0.9	1.69	-2.882	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-0.45	-3.14	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	261.717	-34.687	–	0.17	0.42	–
Joshi et al.	2016	261.717	-34.683	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	261.708	-34.683	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	261.717	-34.687	–	-0.32	1.12	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	261.717	-34.683	–	0.29	-1.2	–
Morales et al.	2013	261.717	-34.687	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.03	2.21	1.58	104	0.152	58	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.03	1.91	–	453	–	58	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.04	2.20	1.58	109	–	266⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.05	2.21	–	219	0.230	–	–	–
He et al.	2023	1.05	2.50	–	100	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.04	2.20	1.58	109	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	89	–	23	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.03	1.91	–	453	0.074	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.82	2.37	–	89	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.82	2.37	–	89	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.82	2.37	–	89	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2