ESO 368 11
(FSR 1353; MWSC 1320; MWSC 1321; FoF 38)
0.95
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
35.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ESO 368 11 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 116.086 | -34.625 | 0.448 | -0.833 | 2.295 | 21.717 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 116.086 | -34.628 | 0.429 | -0.853 | 2.278 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 116.092 | -34.633 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 116.083 | -34.63 | 0.448 | -0.834 | 2.301 | 21.733 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 116.087 | -34.63 | 0.451 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 116.083 | -34.63 | 0.448 | -0.834 | 2.301 | 21.733 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 116.096 | -34.642 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 116.094 | -34.624 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 116.092 | -34.633 | 0.432 | -0.858 | 2.237 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 116.086 | -34.628 | 0.429 | -0.853 | 2.278 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 116.086 | -34.628 | 0.429 | -0.853 | 2.278 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 116.093 | -34.633 | 0.433 | -0.86 | 2.258 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 116.086 | -34.628 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 116.086 | -34.628 | â | â | â | 22.47 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 116.096 | -34.636 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 116.086 | -34.628 | 0.429 | -0.853 | 2.278 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 116.07 | -34.619 | â | -4.704 | 6.497 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 116.094 | -34.624 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 116.092 | -34.619 | â | -0.59 | 3.25 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 116.1 | -34.627 | â | -5.59 | 6.96 | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 116.093 | -34.619 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 116.104 | -34.632 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 116.092 | -34.619 | â | -0.59 | 3.25 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.0 | 1.53 | 1.08 | 530 | 0.082 | 529 | 0.55 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.01 | 1.53 | â | 530 | 0.147 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.90 | 1.74 | â | 372 | â | 547 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 702(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.42 | 1.79 | â | 324 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.04 | 1.57 | 1.08 | 336 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.99 | 1.77 | â | 482 | -0.006 | 511(1) | 0.55 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 881 | â | 90 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.90 | 1.74 | â | 372 | 0.016 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.12 | 1.11 | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.18 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 355 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.71 | 0.82 | â | 1026 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.18 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.18 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.86 | 2.08 | â | 78 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.25 | 0.23 | â | 881 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.25 | 0.23 | â | 881 | â | â | â | â |
| Glushkova et al. | 2010 | 1.49 | 0.19 | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.49 | 0.19 | â | 1000 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.