ESO 332 08
0.14
UTI
0.44
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.29
Clit
0.23
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
44
Core radius and density
0.8 [pc], 5.7 [pc-2]
- CN 0.44 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.29 Poorly studied
- Cdup 0.23 Likely duplicate
Overview
ESO 332 08 is a poorly populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.
â ī¸ Warning: This is likely a duplicate object, which shares a large percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~1.73 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.20 kpc).
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 253.705 | -40.759 | 0.578 | -0.275 | -1.34 | -18.448 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 253.691 | -40.73 | 0.529 | -0.272 | -1.348 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 253.691 | -40.73 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 253.691 | -40.73 | 0.529 | -0.272 | -1.348 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2018 | â | â | â | -1.23 | -2.38 | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 253.695 | -40.715 | â | â | â | â |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 253.679 | -40.708 | â | -2.11 | -4.69 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 253.679 | -40.708 | â | -2.05 | -3.32 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 253.67 | -40.712 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 253.68 | -40.71 | â | 0.05 | -4.1 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 253.679 | -40.708 | â | -2.05 | -3.32 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.2 | 0.88 | â | 148 | 0.146 | 860 | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.58 | 1.13 | â | 5 | 0.063 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.69 | 1.23 | â | 8 | â | 860 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.69 | 1.23 | â | 8 | 0.230 | â | â | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 0.96 | â | â | 148 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.20 | 0.63 | â | 148 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.20 | 0.63 | â | 148 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.20 | 0.63 | â | 148 | â | â | â | â |
MOCA

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.