ESO 275 01
(FSR 1723; MWSC 2335; MWSC 2334; FoF 1998)
0.83
UTI
0.8
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
236
Core radius and density
0.8 [pc], 33 [pc-2]
- CN 0.8 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.81 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
ESO 275 01 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 238.776 | -46.014 | 0.63 | -0.246 | -1.392 | -22.6 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 238.769 | -46.014 | 0.642 | -0.196 | -1.395 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 238.769 | -46.013 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 238.781 | -46.011 | 0.625 | -0.258 | -1.399 | -11.116 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 238.773 | -46.015 | 0.627 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 238.781 | -46.011 | 0.625 | -0.258 | -1.399 | -11.116 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 238.776 | -46.014 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 238.766 | -46.009 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2022 | 238.774 | -46.013 | 0.628 | -0.253 | -1.381 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 238.775 | -46.013 | 0.625 | -0.243 | -1.397 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 238.769 | -46.013 | 0.64 | -0.216 | -1.408 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 238.769 | -46.014 | 0.642 | -0.196 | -1.395 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 238.769 | -46.014 | 0.642 | -0.196 | -1.395 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 238.775 | -46.005 | 0.634 | -0.224 | -1.393 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 238.769 | -46.014 | â | â | â | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 238.765 | -46.02 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 238.769 | -46.014 | 0.642 | -0.196 | -1.395 | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 238.777 | -46.01 | â | â | â | â |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 238.767 | -46.015 | â | -2.41 | -1.97 | â |
| Joshi et al. | 2016 | 238.777 | -46.01 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 238.766 | -46.009 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 238.767 | -46.015 | â | -1.67 | -1.07 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 238.777 | -46.01 | â | -5.43 | -3.77 | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 238.796 | -46.004 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 238.771 | -46.014 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 238.767 | -46.015 | â | -1.67 | -1.07 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.49 | 1.32 | 1.19 | 184 | 0.075 | 482 | 0.47 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.38 | 1.38 | â | 280 | -0.050 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.46 | 1.56 | â | 126 | â | 482 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.19 | 124 | â | 507(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.56 | 1.58 | â | 219 | 0.240 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.19 | 124 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.48 | 1.58 | â | 132 | 0.075 | 412(1) | 0.47 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 589 | â | 108 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2022 | 1.51(1) | 1.25(1) | â | 125(1) | 0.046(1) | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.44 | â | â | 191 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.46 | 1.56 | â | 126 | 0.083 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.50 | 1.04 | â | 178 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 1.65 | 1.53 | â | 219 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.49 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 151 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.46 | 1.08 | â | 283 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.49 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dib et al. | 2018 | 1.51 | â | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Joshi et al. | 2016 | 1.51 | 0.98 | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.51 | 0.98 | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.51 | 0.98 | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2012 | â | â | â | â | â | 830 | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 1.48(1) | 1.23 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.48 | 1.26 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).
Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2151, e_all=0.1399.