Dolidze 36

0.12 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.02

C_dens

0.12

C_C3

0.23

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 14

Core radius and density 4.0 [pc], 0.08 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.02 Very loose
C_C3 0.12 Very low quality
C_lit 0.23 Rarely studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Dolidze 36 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large^* distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is rarely studied in the literature, with no articles listed in the last 8 years.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~5.83 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~0.94 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Close Low extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for Dolidze 36 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	300.58	42.098	0.171	-3.359	-4.088	-37.194
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-1.54	-3.89	–
Dib et al.	2018	300.615	42.165	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	300.54	42.014	–	-0.93	-4.477	77.0
Sampedro et al.	2017	300.625	42.1	–	-1.33	-3.05	–
Joshi et al.	2016	300.615	42.165	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	300.625	42.1	–	-1.47	-3.39	77.0
Piskunov et al.	2008	300.591	42.151	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	300.6	42.15	–	0.19	-0.95	–
Dias et al.	2002	300.625	42.1	–	-1.47	-3.39	77.0

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.935	0.69	–	754	–	117	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	0.97	–	–	832	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	2.16	0.11	–	6310	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.97	0.66	–	832	–	117	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.90	0.69	–	676	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.90	0.69	–	676	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.90	0.69	–	676	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️