Dolidze 29

(MWSC 2937)

0.08 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.01

C_dens

0.12

C_C3

0.13

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 12

Core radius and density 8.1 [pc], 0.07 [pc^-2]

C3 classification DC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.01 Very loose
C_C3 0.12 Very low quality
C_lit 0.13 Rarely studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Dolidze 29 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a young cluster (see Parameters). It is rarely studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.79 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.46 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Relatively close Very high extinction Young

Bica et al. (2019)
Analysis of Dolidze objects by M. Kronberger reported in DAML02. Web updates in DAML02, some were later removed (2003 to 2010).

Dias et al. (2002)
Asterism (Archinal, B. A. & Hynes, S. J. 2003); cat V3.5 (Jan 2016)

Data

🔍 Search references for Dolidze 29 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	277.884	-6.596	0.264	-3.049	-4.425	–
Just et al.	2023	277.842	-6.634	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	277.849	-6.633	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	277.849	-6.633	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	277.842	-6.634	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	277.849	-6.633	–	-0.73	-1.15	–
Lynga	1987	277.848	-6.627	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.46	9.59	–	32	–	339	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	32	–	339	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.46	–	–	32	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.46	9.59	–	32	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.46	9.59	–	32	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.46	9.59	–	32	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️