Dolidze 28

(MWSC 2913)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.19 UTI
0.0
CN
0.05
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.32
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 2.0 [pc], 0.2 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.05 Very loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.32 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Dolidze 28 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~2.53 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.26 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Bica et al. (2019)
Analysis of Dolidze objects by M. Kronberger reported in DAML02.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: one or a few submm emission within the cluster area.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 276.378 -14.665 0.395 -1.716 -2.709 –
Just et al. 2023 276.363 -14.651 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -0.23 -2.56 –
Dib et al. 2018 276.37 -14.65 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 276.375 -14.656 – -0.305 -3.775 0.6
Sampedro et al. 2017 276.371 -14.656 – -1.12 -0.71 –
Joshi et al. 2016 276.37 -14.65 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 276.363 -14.651 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 276.371 -14.656 – 0.17 -1.47 0.6
Kharchenko et al. 2013 276.37 -14.65 – 0.67 -3.58 0.6
Morales et al. 2013 276.371 -14.656 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 276.371 -14.656 – 0.17 -1.47 0.6
Lynga 1987 276.345 -14.649 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.26 2.96 – 178 – 91 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 178 – 91 – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.26 – – 178 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 4.79 5.09 – 25 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.26 2.96 – 178 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.26 2.96 – 178 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.26 2.96 – 178 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.26 2.96 – 178 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸