Dolidze 25

(MWSC 975)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.69 UTI
0.46
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.86
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.8 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.46 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.86 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Dolidze 25 is a poorly populated, very dense object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Distant Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Very young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 101.27 0.237 0.212 -0.354 0.277 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 101.267 0.228 0.201 -0.328 0.263 53.822
Cavallo et al. 2024 101.218 0.269 0.205 – – –
He et al. 2023 101.194 0.318 0.198 -0.364 0.256 57.96
Hunt & Reffert 2023 101.267 0.228 0.201 -0.328 0.263 53.822
Just et al. 2023 101.273 0.242 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 101.269 0.266 0.209 -0.267 0.231 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 101.28 0.24 – -0.031 -1.217 77.4
Kharchenko et al. 2016 101.273 0.242 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 101.275 0.3 – -0.29 -1.79 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 101.28 0.24 – 0.7 -2.31 77.4
Gozha et al. 2012 101.275 0.3 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 101.28 0.3 – 0.17 – –
van den Bergh 2006 101.275 0.3 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 101.232 0.325 – 1.81 -1.98 71.0
Dias et al. 2002 101.275 0.3 – -0.29 -1.79 71.0
Dambis 1999 101.275 0.3 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1731* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.72 1.84 – 83 0.230 – – –
He et al. 2023 3.89 2.25 – 20 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.43 1.64 2.53 77 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 6 – 413 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 4.92* – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 5.56 2.09 – 14 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.80 2.06 – 6 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.80 2.06 – 6 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 6.80 – – 6 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 6.30 2.23 – 7 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 6.30 – – 0 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 6.80 2.48 – 6 – – – –
Dambis 1999 2.99 2.24 – 3 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸