Dolidze 22

(FSR 1006; MWSC 854)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.21 UTI
0.0
CN
0.03
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.39
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 0.1 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.03 Very loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.39 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Dolidze 22 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~7.06 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.77 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Bica et al. (2019)
Asterisms and cluster alikes by B. Alessi reported in DAML02.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 95.859 4.59 0.142 0.109 -0.439 67.155
Just et al. 2023 95.802 4.592 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – 0.2 -1.17 –
Dib et al. 2018 95.809 4.59 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 95.835 4.6 – -0.35 -0.69 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 95.838 4.599 0.4 -0.71 – –
Joshi et al. 2016 95.809 4.59 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 95.802 4.592 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 95.837 4.599 – -0.35 -0.69 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 95.809 4.59 – -1.14 -1.42 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 95.729 4.63 – – – –
Froebrich et al. 2007 95.737 4.626 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 95.838 4.599 – -0.35 -0.69 –
Lynga 1987 95.811 4.654 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.77 1.51 – 234 – 232 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 234 – 112 – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.77 – – 234 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.30 0.93 – 1023 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.77 1.51 – 234 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.77 1.51 – 234 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.77 1.51 – 234 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 352 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.17(1) 2.05 – 355 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.15 2.11 – 355 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸