Dolidze 16

(FSR 0778; MWSC 491)

0.66 UTI

0.54

C_N

0.47

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.77

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 58

Core radius and density 2.0 [pc], 2.4 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.54 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.47 Loose
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.77 Well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Dolidze 16 is a moderately populated, loose object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.76 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.76 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.4957, e_all=0.181.

Data

🔍 Search references for Dolidze 16 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	78.612	32.742	0.784	-0.094	-2.681	-11.011
Almeida et al.	2025	78.664	32.691	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	78.593	32.77	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	78.593	32.77	0.795	-0.108	-2.696	-14.039
Celli et al.	2024	78.623	32.707	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	78.642	32.714	0.794	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	78.593	32.77	0.795	-0.108	-2.696	-14.039
Just et al.	2023	78.641	32.66	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	78.664	32.691	0.764	-0.039	-2.595	–
Spina et al.	2021	78.622	32.687	0.752	-0.054	-2.663	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	78.623	32.707	0.762	-0.063	-2.602	–
Zhong et al.	2020	78.623	32.707	–	-0.063	-2.602	2.55
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	78.623	32.707	0.762	-0.063	-2.602	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	78.623	32.707	0.762	-0.063	-2.602	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	0.45	-3.31	–
Dib et al.	2018	78.649	32.66	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	78.645	32.66	–	0.88	-0.898	-8.4
Sampedro et al.	2017	78.683	32.689	–	0.71	-4.22	–
Joshi et al.	2016	78.649	32.66	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	78.641	32.66	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	78.683	32.689	–	0.49	-4.12	-8.4
Kharchenko et al.	2013	78.649	32.66	–	2.72	-3.02	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	78.649	32.66	–	2.72	-3.02	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	78.583	32.795	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	78.683	32.689	–	0.49	-4.12	-8.4
Lynga	1987	78.641	32.718	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.25	1.14	2.16	38	-0.137	222	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.26	1.26	–	12	–	229	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.182⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.20	1.20	2.16	24	–	261⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	17	–	216	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.28	1.14	–	12	-0.020	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.20	1.20	2.16	24	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	40	–	18	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.26	1.26	–	12	-0.092	–	–	–
Spina et al.	2021	1.33	–	–	17	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.33	0.86	–	17	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	1.24	1.61	–	38	–	–	–	–
Zhong et al.	2020	1.26⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	-0.273	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.26	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.26	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	0.87	–	–	40	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	2.88	2.80	–	1514	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.87	1.05	–	40	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.87	1.05	–	40	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.87	1.05	–	40	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	0.87	1.05	–	40	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.87	1.05	–	40	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3