DBSB 88

(DBSB2003 88; MCM 50; MCM2005b 50; DBS2003 88; MWSC 2213)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.15 UTI
0.0
CN
0.0
Cdens
0.12
CC3
0.31
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 3.9 [pc], 0.02 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.0 Very loose
  • CC3 0.12 Very low quality
  • Clit 0.31 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
DBSB 88 is a sparse, very loose object of very low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, young cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~5.05 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.37 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'EC2' (partially embedded cluster). Morphological flag: cluster partially embedded, presence of an IR bubble.

Mercer et al. (2005)
Associated with mid-IR extended emission. Cluster of stars. Detected using no magnitude cut. Detected in 2MASS catalog with our algorithm.

Dutra et al. (2003)
Classified as stellar group (IRGr).

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 215.004 -65.461 0.198 -8.401 -3.749 -36.049
Just et al. 2023 214.892 -65.43 – – – –
Joshi et al. 2016 214.905 -65.432 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 214.892 -65.43 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 214.905 -65.432 – -8.43 -3.72 –
Morales et al. 2013 214.915 -61.422 – – – –
Mercer et al. 2005 214.913 -61.422 – – – –
Dutra et al. 2003 214.917 -65.427 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.37 5.91 – 71 – 29 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 71 – 29 – –
Joshi et al. 2016 1.37 5.91 – 71 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.37 5.91 – 71 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.37 5.91 – 71 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 1.82 – – 1 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸