DBSB 3

(MWSC 1133)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.74 UTI
0.46
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 2.2 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.46 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.75 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
DBSB 3 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 107.576 -18.436 0.256 -1.912 2.664 –
Almeida et al. 2025 107.581 -18.438 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 107.55 -18.438 0.261 -1.852 2.661 –
Celli et al. 2024 107.579 -18.434 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 107.579 -18.43 0.264 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 107.55 -18.438 0.261 -1.852 2.661 –
Just et al. 2023 107.573 -18.484 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 107.581 -18.438 0.271 -1.89 2.691 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 107.579 -18.434 0.281 -1.937 2.696 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 107.579 -18.434 0.281 -1.937 2.696 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 107.579 -18.434 – – – 41.07
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 107.579 -18.434 0.281 -1.937 2.696 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 107.573 -18.484 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 107.578 -18.486 – 2.83 3.0 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Almeida et al. 2025 2.87 1.60 – 6 – 357 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 590* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 4 – 332 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.55 1.21 – 17 0.080 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 3.48 1.58 2.35 18 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 10 – 112 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.87 1.60 – 6 -0.200 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.24 1.57 – 4 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.23 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 3.23 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.23 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 3.36 3.55 – 10 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 3.36 3.55 – 10 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸