DBSB 104

(DBSB2003 104)

0.42 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.63

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

0.35

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 22

Core radius and density 0.8 [pc], 3.2 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.63 Moderately dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 0.35 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

DBSB 104 is a sparse, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and age parameters (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as tidal capture (resonant trapping binary) 133 along with Theia_2460.

Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair P383, along with Theia_2460.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 0.95 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 0.95 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2091, e_all=0.1177.

Dutra et al. (2003)
Classified as stellar group (IRGr).

Data

🔍 Search references for DBSB 104 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	255.985	-51.103	0.897	-0.492	-2.633	-17.833
Hunt & Reffert	2024	255.97	-51.092	0.91	-0.505	-2.622	-15.078
Celli et al.	2024	255.997	-51.088	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	255.918	-51.1	0.91	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	255.97	-51.092	0.91	-0.505	-2.622	-15.078
He et al.	2022	255.957	-51.074	0.917	-0.541	-2.547	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	255.997	-51.088	0.908	-0.443	-2.692	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	255.997	-51.088	0.908	-0.443	-2.692	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	255.997	-51.088	0.908	-0.443	-2.692	–
Dib et al.	2018	255.997	-51.09	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	255.997	-51.09	–	–	–	–
Dutra et al.	2003	256.015	-51.079	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.04	0.89	1.33	23	0.030	59	–	–
Liu et al.	2025	0.97	0.25	–	19	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	1.04	0.89	1.33	5	–	51⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	27	–	67	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.02	1.31	–	4	0.030	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.04	0.89	1.33	5	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	1.60	–	5	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.08	0.88	–	27	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	1.27	1.28	–	257	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.07	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.07	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	0.81	–	–	234	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.81	0.33	–	234	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3