Danks 2

(MWSC 2093)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.83 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 0.8 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Danks 2 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a very massive, metal-rich, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~7.17 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~3.60 kpc).

Distant Very high extinction Very massive Metal-rich Very young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 198.228 -62.682 0.14 -7.121 -0.571 107.4
Hunt & Reffert 2024 198.223 -62.68 0.14 -7.146 -0.619 -36.519
Celli et al. 2024 198.222 -62.681 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 198.194 -62.695 0.138 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 198.223 -62.68 0.14 -7.146 -0.619 -36.519
Just et al. 2023 198.214 -62.664 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 198.222 -62.681 0.129 -7.016 -0.336 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 198.222 -62.681 0.129 -7.016 -0.336 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 198.222 -62.681 0.129 -7.016 -0.336 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 198.214 -62.664 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 198.225 -62.68 – -9.7 -4.99 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 198.225 -62.667 – -12.51 -1.98 –
Dias et al. 2002 198.229 -62.681 – -23.0 -11.0 -44.0

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 5878* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 2 – 7812 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.56 5.47 – 51 0.830 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 5.63 6.15 2.65 219 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2 – 49 – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 6.32 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 6.32 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.23 7.29 – 2 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.23 7.29 – 2 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 3.60 7.44 – 5 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸