Czernik 29

(OCL 595; MWSC 1234)

0.57 UTI

0.47

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.5

C_C3

0.45

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 47

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 11.1 [N/pc²]

C3 classification BB

C_N 0.47 Poorly populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.5 Intermediate quality
C_lit 0.45 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Czernik 29 is a poorly populated, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with at least one entry reported in the same catalogue. See table with shared members information.

Distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Data

🔍 Search references for Czernik 29 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	112.106	-15.4	0.24	-1.553	1.322	88.409
Hunt & Reffert	2024	112.095	-15.399	0.254	-1.616	1.25	88.404
Cavallo et al.	2024	112.095	-15.398	0.25	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	112.095	-15.399	0.254	-1.616	1.25	88.404
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	112.1	-15.385	0.235	-1.406	1.354	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	112.1	-15.385	0.235	-1.406	1.354	–
Bica et al.	2019	112.085	-15.386	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	112.1	-15.385	0.235	-1.406	1.354	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	112.095	-15.405	–	-5.013	4.53	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	112.075	-15.4	-3.05	2.06	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	112.075	-15.4	–	-3.04	2.18	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	112.092	-15.398	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	112.075	-15.4	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	112.075	-15.4	–	-3.04	2.18	–
Lynga	1987	112.071	-15.405	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	3.625	1.4	0.49	243	-0.440	904	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	455⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	3.06	1.72	–	288	-0.440	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	3.57	1.32	0.49	243	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.48	1.09	–	151	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	3.68	1.59	–	126	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	3.80	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	3.80	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	3.51	0.82	–	617	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2012	–	–	–	–	–	1353	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	3.79⁽¹⁾	1.14	–	251	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	4.17	1.51	–	200	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	3.00	1.48	–	282	–	–	–	–
Lynga	1987	–	–	–	63	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster	%	RA	DEC	Plx	pmRA	pmDE	Rv	UTI
Haffner 10	38.3	112.15	-15.36	0.26	-1.18	1.57	87.99	0.88
HSC 1820	4.3	111.98	-15.4	0.17	-1.51	1.47	–	0.11

💡 Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Czernik 29 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3