Czernik 27

(OCL 526; MWSC 1078)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.73 UTI
0.72
CN
0.57
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.9 [pc], 2.8 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.72 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.57 Moderately dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.81 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Czernik 27 is a moderately populated, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2039, e_all=0.1825.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 105.832 6.384 0.202 -0.49 -1.421 57.059
Li et al. 2025 105.83 6.382 0.221 -0.505 -1.395 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 105.838 6.375 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 105.827 6.386 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 105.833 6.383 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 105.833 6.383 0.209 -0.475 -1.427 58.966
Cavallo et al. 2024 105.838 6.375 0.208 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 105.833 6.383 0.209 -0.475 -1.427 58.966
Almeida et al. 2023 105.828 6.387 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 105.83 6.382 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 105.827 6.386 0.209 -0.547 -1.393 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 105.83 6.382 0.221 -0.505 -1.395 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 105.8 6.417 – -0.61 -1.587 –
Zhong et al. 2020 105.83 6.382 – -0.505 -1.395 56.534
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 105.83 6.382 0.221 -0.505 -1.395 –
Bossini et al. 2019 105.83 6.382 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 105.83 6.382 – – – 41.33
Bica et al. 2019 105.82 6.382 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 105.83 6.382 0.221 -0.505 -1.395 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 105.825 6.413 – -2.177 -0.59 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 105.8 6.417 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 105.8 6.417 – -2.32 -1.94 –
Gozha et al. 2012 105.8 6.417 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 105.825 6.391 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 105.8 6.417 – -2.32 -1.94 –
Lynga 1987 105.797 6.404 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 4.06 0.44 0.36 1074 -0.266 572 0.64 1
Li et al. 2025 4.63 0.42 – 1026 -0.018 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.250(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 3.97 0.60 – 1159 – 322 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.220(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 4.06 0.12 0.36 934 – 572(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.21 1.14 – 977 -0.730 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.06 0.12 0.36 933 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 4.06 0.39 – 1268 -0.162 595(1) 0.64 –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 4.31 0.44 – 871 – 466 – 1(1)
Dias et al. 2021 3.97 0.60 – 1159 -0.281 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 4.31 0.44 – 871 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 4.33 0.68 – 794 – – – –
Zhong et al. 2020 4.00(1) 0.54 – 9065 -0.188 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 4.00 – – – – – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 3.92 0.54 – 1161 -0.380 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 4.00 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 4.00 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 6.08 0.60 – 575 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 713 – –
Gozha et al. 2012 4.29 – – 1122 -0.380 – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 3.84(1) 0.00 – 1122 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 4.29 0.22 – 1122 -0.380 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️