Czernik 27

(OCL 526; MWSC 1078)

0.89 UTI

0.72

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AB

Number of members (P>50%) 93

Radius (P>50% members) 2.1 [arcmin]

C_N 0.72 Moderately populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Czernik 27 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Distant Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Old

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Czernik 27 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	105.832	6.384	0.202	-0.49	-1.421	57.059
Li et al.	2025	105.83	6.382	0.221	-0.505	-1.395	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	105.838	6.375	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	105.827	6.386	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	105.833	6.383	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	105.833	6.383	0.209	-0.475	-1.427	58.966
Cavallo et al.	2024	105.838	6.375	0.208	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	105.833	6.383	0.209	-0.475	-1.427	58.966
Almeida et al.	2023	105.828	6.387	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	105.827	6.386	0.209	-0.547	-1.393	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	105.83	6.382	0.221	-0.505	-1.395	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	105.8	6.417	–	-0.61	-1.587	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	105.83	6.382	0.221	-0.505	-1.395	–
Bossini et al.	2019	105.83	6.382	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	105.83	6.382	–	–	–	41.33
Bica et al.	2019	105.82	6.382	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	105.83	6.382	0.221	-0.505	-1.395	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	105.825	6.413	–	-2.177	-0.59	–
Dias et al.	2014	105.8	6.417	–	-2.32	-1.94	–
Gozha et al.	2012	105.8	6.417	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	105.8	6.417	–	-2.32	-1.94	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	4.63	0.42	–	1026	-0.018	–	–	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.250*	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	3.97	0.60	–	1159	–	322	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.220*	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	572*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	3.21	1.14	–	977	-0.730	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	4.06	0.12	0.36	933	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	4.06	0.39	–	1268	-0.162	595*	0.64	–
Dias et al.	2021	3.97	0.60	–	1159	-0.281	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	4.31	0.44	–	871	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	4.00	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	3.92	0.54	–	1161	-0.380	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	4.00	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	4.00	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	6.08	0.59	–	575	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	4.29	–	–	1122	-0.380	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	4.29	0.22	–	1122	-0.380	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3