Czernik 26

(MWSC 886; OCL 544)

0.62 UTI

0.6

C_N

0.22

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

0.65

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 69

Core radius and density 2.7 [pc], 1.1 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AA

C_N 0.6 Moderately populated
C_dens 0.22 Very loose
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 0.65 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Czernik 26 is a moderately populated, very loose object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, well below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Very distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.66 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.66 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2174, e_all=0.1709.

Data

🔍 Search references for Czernik 26 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	97.745	-4.18	0.111	0.036	0.197	95.275
Hu & Soubiran	2025	97.741	-4.181	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	97.746	-4.178	0.103	0.037	0.193	93.539
Cavallo et al.	2024	97.741	-4.182	0.104	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	97.746	-4.178	0.103	0.037	0.193	93.539
Just et al.	2023	97.748	-4.214	–	–	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	97.754	-4.183	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	97.754	-4.183	0.06	0.142	0.191	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	97.754	-4.183	0.06	0.142	0.191	–
Bica et al.	2019	97.753	-4.193	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	97.754	-4.183	0.06	0.142	0.191	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	0.63	-1.4	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	97.7	-4.217	–	2.88	0.16	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	97.748	-4.214	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	97.7	-4.217	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	97.7	-4.217	–	2.99	0.05	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	97.755	-4.215	–	-1.69	0.9	–
Gozha et al.	2012	97.7	-4.217	–	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	97.742	-4.174	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	97.7	-4.217	–	2.99	0.05	–
Lynga	1987	97.7	-4.22	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	7.58	1.035	1.745	880	-0.350	608	–	0
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.320⁽⁵⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	7.58	1.21	1.74	613	–	662⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	5.01	1.12	–	1000	-0.030	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	7.58	1.21	1.75	614	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	1000	–	608	–	–
Jadhav & Subramaniam	2021	7.08	0.88	–	525	–	166	–	0⁽¹⁾
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	7.08	0.88	–	525	–	–	–	–
Kounkel et al.	2020	7.07	1.34	–	759	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	11.29	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	11.29	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	7.66	0.79	–	1000	–	–	–	–
Perren et al.	2015	9.10⁽¹⁾	0.95⁽¹⁾	–	708⁽¹⁾	0.140⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	1.20	1.42	–	170	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	7.66	0.79	–	1000	-0.380	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	8.87	–	–	1000	-0.380	–	–	–
Bukowiecki et al.	2011	5.98⁽¹⁾	0.95	–	1413	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	8.87	1.20	–	1000	-0.380	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3