Czernik 26

(MWSC 886; OCL 544)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.83 UTI
0.6
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.79
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.6 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.79 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Czernik 26 is a moderately populated, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, well below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Very distant Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Old

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 97.745 -4.18 0.111 0.036 0.197 95.275
Hu & Soubiran 2025 97.741 -4.181 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 97.746 -4.178 0.103 0.037 0.193 93.539
Cavallo et al. 2024 97.741 -4.182 0.104 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 97.746 -4.178 0.103 0.037 0.193 93.539
Just et al. 2023 97.748 -4.214 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 97.754 -4.183 0.06 0.142 0.191 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 97.754 -4.183 0.06 0.142 0.191 –
Bica et al. 2019 97.753 -4.193 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 97.754 -4.183 0.06 0.142 0.191 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 97.748 -4.214 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 97.7 -4.217 – 2.99 0.05 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 97.755 -4.215 – -1.69 0.9 –
Gozha et al. 2012 97.7 -4.217 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 97.7 -4.217 – 2.99 0.05 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.320* – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 662* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 5.01 1.12 – 1000 -0.030 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 7.58 1.21 1.75 614 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1000 – 608 – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 7.08 0.88 – 525 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 11.29 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 11.29 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 7.66 0.78 – 1000 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 7.66 0.78 – 1000 -0.380 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 8.87 – – 1000 -0.380 – – –
Dias et al. 2002 8.87 1.18 – 1000 -0.380 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸