Czernik 20
(MWSC 508; OCL 427)
0.85
UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.5
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.75 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Czernik 20 is a rich, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Old
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 80.12 | 39.536 | 0.275 | 0.564 | -1.591 | 31.076 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 80.129 | 39.545 | 0.264 | 0.619 | -1.583 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 80.124 | 39.544 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 80.136 | 39.542 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 80.133 | 39.544 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 80.133 | 39.544 | 0.286 | 0.543 | -1.59 | 30.945 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 80.124 | 39.544 | 0.285 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 80.133 | 39.544 | 0.286 | 0.543 | -1.59 | 30.945 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 80.105 | 39.54 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 80.136 | 39.542 | 0.268 | 0.612 | -1.576 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 80.129 | 39.545 | 0.264 | 0.619 | -1.583 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 80.115 | 39.54 | â | 0.58 | -1.56 | 31.4 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 80.129 | 39.545 | 0.264 | 0.619 | -1.583 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 80.055 | 39.573 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 80.129 | 39.545 | 0.264 | 0.619 | -1.583 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 80.13 | 39.547 | â | -0.67 | -3.3 | -29.97 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 80.105 | 39.54 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 80.133 | 39.547 | â | -0.67 | -3.3 | -29.97 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 80.115 | 39.54 | â | -3.76 | -1.12 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 80.115 | 39.54 | â | -3.76 | -1.12 | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 80.025 | 39.467 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 80.133 | 39.547 | â | -0.67 | -3.3 | -29.97 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 80.025 | 39.467 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.48 | 1.55 | â | 325 | -0.148 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.220* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.42 | 1.86 | â | 1479 | â | 434 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.224* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 426* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.60 | 2.10 | â | 1259 | -0.510 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.38 | 1.47 | 0.58 | 1901 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1549 | â | 238 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.42 | 1.86 | â | 1479 | -0.113 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.48 | 1.49 | â | 1660 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.160 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 3.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 3.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.96 | 1.30 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.00 | 1.86 | â | 1549 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.00 | 1.86 | â | 1549 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.00 | 1.86 | â | 1549 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.37 | 1.30 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 3.37 | 1.31 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 3.56 | 1.65 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.