Czernik 16

(MWSC 282; OCL 387; FSR 0645)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.90 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 4.7 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Czernik 16 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object shares a moderate percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Relatively close High extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 52.755 52.598 0.376 0.785 -2.208 -33.549
Li et al. 2025 52.754 52.612 0.34 0.795 -2.181 –
Almeida et al. 2025 52.756 52.609 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 52.766 52.611 0.377 0.787 -2.221 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 52.768 52.585 0.376 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 52.766 52.611 0.377 0.787 -2.221 –
Almeida et al. 2023 52.749 52.604 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 52.781 52.631 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 52.756 52.609 0.335 0.777 -2.205 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 52.754 52.612 0.34 0.795 -2.181 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 52.7 52.65 – 0.794 -1.889 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 52.754 52.612 0.34 0.795 -2.181 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 52.754 52.612 – – – -30.71
Bica et al. 2019 52.773 52.603 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 52.754 52.612 0.34 0.795 -2.181 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 52.785 52.632 – -2.38 -1.998 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 52.781 52.631 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 52.7 52.65 – 0.29 -3.4 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 52.792 52.632 – -2.62 -0.89 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 52.792 52.632 – -2.62 -0.89 –
Dias et al. 2002 52.7 52.65 – 0.29 -3.4 –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 2.13 2.97 – 465 -0.043 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.27 2.79 – 336 – 506 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 920* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.75 3.08 – 148 0.570 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.43 3.11 1.45 83 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.29 2.94 – 253 -0.111 452* 0.62 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 20 – 459 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.27 2.79 – 336 -0.057 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.75 2.61 – 324 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.71 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.71 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.71 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.56 2.42 – 200 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.70 3.56 – 20 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.70 3.56 – 20 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.70 3.56 – 20 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.58 4.00 – 200 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
OC 0270 30.9 52.76 52.62 0.38 0.8 -2.22 – 0.0

πŸ’‘ Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that Czernik 16 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️