Czernik 1

(MWSC 17; OCL 283)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.79 UTI
0.45
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.5
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.2 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.45 Poorly populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Czernik 1 is a poorly populated, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 1.904 61.483 0.313 -2.953 -1.449 –
Li et al. 2025 1.906 61.476 0.31 -2.964 -1.395 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.907 61.477 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 1.907 61.479 0.321 -2.949 -1.465 –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.909 61.486 0.32 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.907 61.479 0.321 -2.949 -1.465 –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.908 61.481 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 1.893 61.486 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.907 61.477 0.308 -2.956 -1.379 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.906 61.476 0.31 -2.964 -1.395 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.906 61.476 0.31 -2.964 -1.395 –
Bica et al. 2019 1.915 61.479 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.906 61.476 0.31 -2.964 -1.395 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.905 61.475 – -1.073 -0.342 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.893 61.486 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.902 61.49 – -3.83 1.66 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.902 61.49 – -3.83 1.66 –
Dias et al. 2002 1.908 61.475 – -3.83 1.66 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 2.58 2.48 – 25 -0.065 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.62 2.34 – 22 – 228 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 510* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.90 2.23 – 62 0.630 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.88 2.35 0.80 68 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.69 2.39 – 17 -0.079 201* 0.44 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 58 – 22 – –
Dias et al. 2021 2.62 2.34 – 22 -0.087 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.12 2.17 – 37 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.95 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.95 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.17 2.27 – 14 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.61 2.58 – 58 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.61 2.58 – 58 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.61 2.58 – 58 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.53 3.81 – 5 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸