Collinder 94
(NGC 2236; MWSC 881; OCL 501; FSR 1002; FoF 80)
0.95
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
38.7 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 94 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 97.415 | 6.834 | 0.342 | -0.78 | 0.025 | 59.679 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 97.416 | 6.834 | 0.35 | -0.752 | 0.01 | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 97.417 | 6.834 | β | β | β | β |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 97.641 | 6.791 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 97.421 | 6.838 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 97.411 | 6.831 | 0.348 | -0.782 | 0.016 | 59.296 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 97.417 | 6.834 | 0.347 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 97.411 | 6.831 | 0.348 | -0.782 | 0.016 | 59.296 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 97.423 | 6.843 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 97.41 | 6.818 | β | β | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 97.409 | 6.839 | 0.384 | -0.765 | 0.041 | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 97.416 | 6.834 | 0.35 | -0.752 | 0.01 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 97.421 | 6.838 | 0.36 | -0.754 | -0.003 | 59.362 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 97.416 | 6.834 | 0.35 | -0.752 | 0.01 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 97.412 | 6.83 | β | -0.654 | -0.048 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 97.416 | 6.834 | 0.35 | -0.752 | 0.01 | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 97.422 | 6.83 | 0.36 | -0.685 | 0.028 | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 97.416 | 6.834 | β | β | β | 59.91 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 97.43 | 6.839 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 97.416 | 6.834 | 0.35 | -0.752 | 0.01 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 97.41 | 6.831 | β | -2.37 | -0.31 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 97.41 | 6.818 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 97.412 | 6.83 | β | -2.37 | -0.31 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 97.417 | 6.817 | β | -1.95 | -1.41 | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 97.412 | 6.83 | β | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 97.425 | 6.833 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 97.412 | 6.83 | β | -2.37 | -0.31 | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 2.64 | 1.515 | 1.12 | 845 | -0.150 | 1897 | 0.59 | 0.05 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.77 | 1.54 | β | 845 | -0.055 | β | β | β |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | β | β | β | β | -0.150(5) | β | β | β |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 2.42 | 1.65 | β | 893 | -0.150 | β | β | 0.05(1) |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.42 | 1.65 | β | 893 | β | 2463 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 3492(1) | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.37 | 1.49 | β | 1072 | -0.070 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.56 | 1.38 | 1.12 | 853 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.42 | 1.67 | β | 899 | -0.153 | 1331(1) | 0.59 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 562 | β | 213 | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.61(1) | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.64 | 1.46 | β | 339 | β | β | β | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.42 | 1.65 | β | 893 | -0.100 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.43 | 1.05 | β | 1148 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.64 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | β | β | β | 1180 | -0.250 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.64 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.64 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.97 | 1.46 | β | 365 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.65 | 1.74 | β | 562 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.65 | 1.74 | β | 562 | β | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.93 | β | β | 345 | -0.300 | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.93 | 1.49 | β | 347 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.93 | 1.48 | β | 345 | -0.300 | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.