Collinder 93
(NGC 2232; MWSC 871; OCL 545; Escorial 8; FoF 2393; OCSN 227)
0.97
UTI
0.83
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
36.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.83 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 93 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 96.909 | -4.743 | 3.118 | -4.722 | -1.766 | 24.53 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 96.888 | -4.749 | 3.067 | -4.745 | -1.84 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 96.902 | -4.745 | 3.12 | -4.703 | -1.767 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 96.855 | -4.712 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 96.949 | -5.039 | 3.041 | -4.673 | -1.669 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 96.978 | -4.772 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 96.978 | -4.772 | 3.12 | -4.717 | -1.77 | 22.767 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 96.888 | -4.749 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 96.838 | -4.712 | 3.118 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 96.978 | -4.772 | 3.12 | -4.717 | -1.77 | 22.767 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 96.938 | -4.668 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 96.98 | -4.79 | 3.14 | -4.71 | -1.77 | 25.44 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 96.983 | -4.793 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 96.559 | -3.801 | 3.115 | -4.575 | -1.99 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 96.88 | -4.755 | 3.1 | -4.721 | -1.833 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 96.888 | -4.749 | 3.067 | -4.745 | -1.84 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 96.855 | -4.712 | 3.075 | -4.739 | -1.869 | 25.516 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 96.888 | -4.749 | 3.067 | -4.745 | -1.84 | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | 96.99 | -4.795 | â | 0.13 | 1.42 | 81.4 |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 96.888 | -4.749 | 3.067 | -4.745 | -1.84 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 96.9 | -4.779 | 3.071 | -4.734 | -1.844 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 96.888 | -4.749 | â | â | â | 25.35 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 96.997 | -4.763 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 96.888 | -4.749 | 3.067 | -4.745 | -1.84 | â |
| Yen et al. | 2018 | 96.96 | -4.792 | 3.56 | -4.62 | -1.8 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 96.99 | -4.795 | â | -3.37 | -3.1 | 19.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 96.983 | -4.793 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 96.812 | -4.758 | â | 0.3 | -1.83 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 96.99 | -4.795 | â | -4.15 | -2.43 | 19.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 96.813 | -4.758 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 96.97 | -4.799 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 96.81 | -4.76 | â | 0.6 | â | 19.85 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 96.97 | -4.799 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 97.008 | -4.847 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 96.97 | -4.8 | â | -4.31 | -2.4 | 16.63 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 96.97 | -4.8 | â | -5.27 | -1.73 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 96.657 | -4.801 | â | -4.36 | -3.23 | 20.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 96.812 | -4.758 | â | -3.37 | -3.1 | 26.6 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 96.812 | -4.758 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 0.325 | 0.09 | 0.57 | 31 | 0.016 | 159 | 0.265 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.31 | 0.23 | â | 17 | -0.261 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.32 | 0.27 | â | 15 | 0.500 | 204 | 0.28 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.32 | 0.16 | â | 31 | â | 159 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.31 | 0.01 | â | 26 | 0.016 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.039(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 165(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 18 | â | 179 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.33 | 0.54 | â | 12 | -0.110 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.32 | 0.14 | 0.57 | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.31 | 0.24 | â | 28 | -0.035 | 227(1) | 0.25 | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.36 | 0.31 | â | 22 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 50 | â | 9 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.05 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.32(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.32 | 0.09 | â | 52 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.32 | 0.16 | â | 31 | 0.016 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.31 | 0.01 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Donor et al. | 2020 | â | â | â | â | -0.360 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.32 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 34 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.32 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.32 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Yen et al. | 2018 | 0.36 | 0.00 | â | 105 | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.37 | 0.10 | â | 56 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.33 | 0.10 | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.33 | 0.10 | â | 50 | 0.320 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.36 | â | â | 53 | 0.320 | 102 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.33 | 0.09 | â | 31 | â | 69(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.33 | 0.09 | â | 31 | â | 41 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.36 | 0.09 | â | 54 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.33 | 0.09 | â | 31 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.32 | 0.09 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 0.36 | â | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.36 | 0.09 | â | 53 | 0.320 | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 0.38 | 0.07 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.