Collinder 76
(NGC 2112; MWSC 692; OCL 509; FSR 1007; LLA 1)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members)
1259
Stellar density (N50/rad)
66.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 76 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 88.448 | 0.403 | 0.91 | -2.71 | 4.276 | 31.134 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 88.452 | 0.403 | 0.877 | -2.713 | 4.27 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 88.453 | 0.406 | â | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 88.453 | 0.396 | 0.909 | -2.715 | 4.288 | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 88.673 | 0.377 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 88.456 | 0.4 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 88.436 | 0.402 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 88.436 | 0.402 | 0.919 | -2.71 | 4.277 | 31.847 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 88.453 | 0.406 | 0.917 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 88.436 | 0.402 | 0.919 | -2.71 | 4.277 | 31.847 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 88.426 | 0.414 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 88.447 | 0.404 | 0.911 | -2.707 | 4.282 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 88.452 | 0.388 | 0.898 | -2.711 | 4.289 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 88.446 | 0.398 | 0.91 | -2.695 | 4.26 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 88.452 | 0.403 | 0.877 | -2.713 | 4.27 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 88.456 | 0.4 | 0.875 | -2.703 | 4.275 | 30.861 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 88.452 | 0.403 | 0.877 | -2.713 | 4.27 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 88.452 | 0.403 | 0.877 | -2.713 | 4.27 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 88.452 | 0.403 | â | â | â | 30.86 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 88.476 | 0.411 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 88.452 | 0.403 | 0.877 | -2.713 | 4.27 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 88.44 | 0.41 | â | -2.448 | 0.477 | 39.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 88.426 | 0.414 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 88.437 | 0.41 | â | -3.07 | 1.2 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 88.432 | 0.413 | â | -9.0 | 3.0 | 39.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 88.438 | 0.41 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 88.44 | 0.41 | â | 0.15 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 88.438 | 0.41 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 88.438 | 0.41 | â | -1.48 | 1.55 | 30.9 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.1 | 2.19 | 1.98 | 1778 | 0.144 | 2869 | 0.39 | 0.15 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.92 | 2.09 | â | 2126 | -0.061 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.140(5) | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 2.52 | 2.68 | â | 2290 | -0.500 | 2172 | 0.39 | â |
| Carrasco-Varela et al. | 2025 | 1.50 | 2.33 | â | 1211 | 0.150 | â | â | 0.15(1) |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.10 | 2.33 | â | 1211 | â | 2920 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.130(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 4166(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.13 | 2.19 | â | 1698 | 0.320 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.03 | 2.30 | 1.98 | 1191 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 2065 | â | 2818 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 2.45 | â | 1413 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.12 | â | â | 2089 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.10(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.10 | 1.86 | â | 1778 | â | â | â | 4 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.10 | 2.33 | â | 1211 | 0.139 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.15 | 1.71 | â | 2089 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.77 | 2.23 | â | 1122 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.98 | 1.94 | â | 2065 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.98 | 1.94 | â | 2065 | 0.160 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.94 | â | â | 1778 | 0.160 | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.85 | 1.95 | â | 1995 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.94 | 1.86 | â | 1778 | 0.160 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.