Collinder 76

(NGC 2112; MWSC 692; OCL 509; FSR 1007; LLA 1)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 66.6 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Collinder 76 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 88.448 0.403 0.91 -2.71 4.276 31.134
Li et al. 2025 88.452 0.403 0.877 -2.713 4.27 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 88.453 0.406 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 88.453 0.396 0.909 -2.715 4.288 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 88.673 0.377 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 88.456 0.4 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 88.436 0.402 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 88.436 0.402 0.919 -2.71 4.277 31.847
Cavallo et al. 2024 88.453 0.406 0.917 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 88.436 0.402 0.919 -2.71 4.277 31.847
Just et al. 2023 88.426 0.414 – – – –
He et al. 2022 88.447 0.404 0.911 -2.707 4.282 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 88.452 0.388 0.898 -2.711 4.289 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 88.446 0.398 0.91 -2.695 4.26 –
Rain et al. 2021 88.452 0.403 0.877 -2.713 4.27 –
Dias et al. 2021 88.456 0.4 0.875 -2.703 4.275 30.861
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 88.452 0.403 0.877 -2.713 4.27 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 88.452 0.403 0.877 -2.713 4.27 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 88.452 0.403 – – – 30.86
Bica et al. 2019 88.476 0.411 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 88.452 0.403 0.877 -2.713 4.27 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 88.44 0.41 – -2.448 0.477 39.0
Kharchenko et al. 2016 88.426 0.414 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 88.437 0.41 – -3.07 1.2 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 88.432 0.413 – -9.0 3.0 39.0
Gozha et al. 2012 88.438 0.41 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 88.44 0.41 – 0.15 – –
van den Bergh 2006 88.438 0.41 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 88.438 0.41 – -1.48 1.55 30.9

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.1 2.19 1.98 1778 0.144 2869 0.39 0.15
Li et al. 2025 0.92 2.09 – 2126 -0.061 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.140(5) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 2.52 2.68 – 2290 -0.500 2172 0.39 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 1.50 2.33 – 1211 0.150 – – 0.15(1)
Almeida et al. 2025 1.10 2.33 – 1211 – 2920 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.130(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 4166(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.13 2.19 – 1698 0.320 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.03 2.30 1.98 1191 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2065 – 2818 – –
He et al. 2022 – 2.45 – 1413 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 1.12 – – 2089 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.10(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.10 1.86 – 1778 – – – 4
Dias et al. 2021 1.10 2.33 – 1211 0.139 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.15 1.71 – 2089 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.10 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.10 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.10 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.77 2.23 – 1122 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 0.98 1.94 – 2065 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 0.98 1.94 – 2065 0.160 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.94 – – 1778 0.160 – – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.85 1.95 – 1995 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.94 1.86 – 1778 0.160 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸