Collinder 58

(NGC 1778; MWSC 472; OCL 429; FoF 2141)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.92 UTI
0.84
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 23.3 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.84 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Collinder 58 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 77.032 37.02 0.577 0.465 -3.19 4.892
Li et al. 2025 77.033 37.02 0.581 0.506 -3.145 –
Almeida et al. 2025 77.038 37.015 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 77.026 37.018 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 77.026 37.018 0.583 0.472 -3.208 -2.253
Cavallo et al. 2024 77.027 37.02 0.585 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 77.026 37.018 0.583 0.472 -3.208 -2.253
Almeida et al. 2023 77.029 37.012 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 76.985 37.028 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 77.033 37.022 0.612 0.533 -3.157 –
Rain et al. 2021 77.033 37.02 0.581 0.506 -3.145 –
Dias et al. 2021 77.038 37.015 0.581 0.497 -3.139 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 77.033 37.02 0.581 0.506 -3.145 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 77.017 37.023 – 0.592 -3.123 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 77.033 37.02 0.581 0.506 -3.145 –
Liu & Pang 2019 77.036 37.015 0.57 0.502 -3.134 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 77.033 37.02 – – – -26.24
Bica et al. 2019 77.01 37.023 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 77.033 37.02 0.581 0.506 -3.145 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 77.01 37.024 – -0.048 -1.997 8.2
Kharchenko et al. 2016 76.985 37.028 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 77.017 37.023 – -0.51 -3.93 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 76.995 37.028 – -0.76 -7.59 8.2
Gozha et al. 2012 77.017 37.023 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 76.995 37.028 – -0.76 -7.59 8.17
Piskunov et al. 2008 77.0 37.017 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 77.01 37.02 – 0.18 – 8.17
van den Bergh 2006 77.0 37.017 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 77.01 37.02 – -0.76 -3.11 8.17
Kharchenko et al. 2003 77.04 37.04 – -0.09 -3.9 –
Chen et al. 2003 77.03 37.035 – 3.33 -3.21 10.0
Dias et al. 2002 77.017 37.023 – 3.33 -3.21 4.95
Dambis 1999 77.017 37.023 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.5 1.04 0.95 151 -0.070 535 0.48 0.0
Li et al. 2025 1.53 1.19 – 178 -0.043 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.48 1.37 – 98 – 640 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.130(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1025(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.67 1.36 – 151 0.190 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.59 1.03 0.95 174 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.54 1.38 – 97 -0.069 535(1) 0.48 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 282 – 151 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.63(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.64 1.02 – 141 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.48 1.37 – 98 -0.072 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.67 0.87 – 178 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.64 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 204 -0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.64 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.64 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.47 1.06 – 137 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.50 0.93 – 282 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.50 0.93 – 282 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.47 – – 143 – 107 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.50 0.93 – 282 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.45 0.71 – 151 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.47 1.05 – 145 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.45 0.71 – 151 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.47 1.05 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.47 – – 140 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.47 1.04 – 143 – – – –
Dambis 1999 1.53 1.04 – 126 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️