Collinder 385
(NGC 6664; MWSC 2962; OCL 68; Alessi 153)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
33.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 385 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 279.121 | -8.184 | 0.464 | -0.075 | -2.591 | 16.065 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 279.125 | -8.188 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 279.118 | -8.206 | 0.455 | -0.099 | -2.593 | 17.343 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 279.119 | -8.185 | 0.456 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 279.118 | -8.206 | 0.455 | -0.099 | -2.593 | 17.343 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 279.125 | -8.212 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 279.131 | -8.199 | 0.509 | -0.091 | -2.552 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 279.125 | -8.188 | 0.473 | -0.094 | -2.55 | 2.007 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | -4.44 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 279.125 | -8.194 | â | â | â | -4.44 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 279.14 | -8.216 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 279.125 | -8.194 | 0.468 | -0.089 | -2.561 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 279.15 | -7.814 | â | -2.729 | -3.562 | 17.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 279.125 | -8.212 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 279.154 | -7.813 | â | 0.54 | 4.18 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 279.132 | -8.21 | â | -2.52 | -2.0 | 17.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 279.154 | -7.813 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 279.15 | -7.81 | â | 0.1 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 279.175 | -8.217 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 279.18 | -8.22 | â | 0.47 | -1.02 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 279.209 | -8.173 | â | -0.31 | -2.31 | 17.8 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 279.154 | -7.813 | â | -0.31 | -2.31 | 18.58 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 279.154 | -7.813 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.76 | 2.2 | 2.42 | 24 | -0.299 | 1545 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.55 | 1.73 | â | 652 | 0.150 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.94 | 2.44 | â | 13 | â | 1545 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3177(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.76 | 2.95 | â | 50 | -0.460 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.96 | 2.54 | 2.42 | 69 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 79 | â | 147 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.95(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.01 | 2.17 | â | 14 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.94 | 2.44 | â | 13 | -0.138 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.11 | 1.94 | â | 224 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.01 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.90 | 2.17 | â | 24 | -2.028 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.01 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.01 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.18 | 2.19 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.71 | 2.29 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.71 | 2.29 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.16 | â | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.16 | 2.20 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.16 | 1.86 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.16 | â | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.16 | 2.20 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.26 | 2.26 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.