Collinder 339
(VDBH 239; NGC 6396; MWSC 2644; OCL 1018; vdBergh-Hagen 239; ESO 393 10)
0.95
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
41.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 339 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the distance, age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
(*): The parallax distance estimate (~2.73 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.78 kpc).
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 264.395 | -35.018 | 0.366 | -0.477 | -2.041 | -13.229 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 264.399 | -35.013 | 0.353 | -0.451 | -2.05 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 264.405 | -35.013 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 264.397 | -35.022 | 0.36 | -0.46 | -2.045 | -27.817 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 264.399 | -35.013 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 264.398 | -35.023 | 0.359 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 264.397 | -35.022 | 0.36 | -0.46 | -2.045 | -27.817 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 264.395 | -35.023 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 264.408 | -35.014 | 0.383 | -0.449 | -2.06 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 264.399 | -35.013 | 0.353 | -0.451 | -2.05 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 264.405 | -35.013 | 0.359 | -0.436 | -2.027 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 264.399 | -35.013 | 0.353 | -0.451 | -2.05 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 264.399 | -35.013 | 0.353 | -0.451 | -2.05 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 264.399 | -35.013 | â | â | â | -13.48 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 264.396 | -35.025 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 264.399 | -35.013 | 0.353 | -0.451 | -2.05 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 264.405 | -35.028 | â | -1.468 | 2.216 | -29.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 264.395 | -35.023 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 264.4 | -35.027 | â | -1.52 | -0.9 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 264.405 | -35.022 | â | 1.45 | -5.83 | -29.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 264.4 | -35.027 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 264.4 | -35.03 | â | 0.03 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 264.525 | -35.0 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 264.4 | -35.027 | â | -1.52 | -0.9 | -13.55 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 264.4 | -35.027 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.785 | 2.87 | 2.57 | 32 | -0.359 | 714 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.71 | 1.52 | â | 1573 | -0.359 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.14 | 2.85 | â | 13 | â | 528 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2186(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 15 | â | 899 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.43 | 3.75 | â | 17 | -0.770 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.47 | 3.36 | 2.57 | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 32 | â | 13 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.57(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.62 | 2.85 | â | 32 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.14 | 2.85 | â | 13 | 0.288 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.52 | 2.93 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.21 | 2.82 | â | 36 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.17 | 3.29 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.17 | 3.29 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.19 | â | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.19 | 2.88 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.19 | 2.87 | â | 32 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.12 | 2.86 | â | 22 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.