Collinder 304
(NGC 6152; MWSC 2423; OCL 961; ESO 179 09)
0.96
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
24.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 304 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 248.212 | -52.637 | 0.609 | -2.565 | -4.99 | -35.927 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 248.213 | -52.629 | 0.594 | -2.511 | -4.98 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 248.216 | -52.624 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 248.158 | -52.621 | 0.608 | -2.581 | -4.993 | -34.365 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 248.222 | -52.631 | 0.608 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 248.158 | -52.621 | 0.608 | -2.581 | -4.993 | -34.365 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 248.235 | -52.621 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 248.216 | -52.624 | 0.594 | -2.519 | -4.972 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 248.163 | -52.639 | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 248.213 | -52.629 | 0.594 | -2.511 | -4.98 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 248.216 | -52.624 | 0.594 | -2.519 | -4.972 | -35.513 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 248.213 | -52.629 | 0.594 | -2.511 | -4.98 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 248.213 | -52.629 | 0.594 | -2.511 | -4.98 | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 248.213 | -52.629 | â | -2.536 | -4.987 | 2.204 |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 248.213 | -52.629 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 248.213 | -52.629 | â | â | â | -35.7 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 248.17 | -52.645 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 248.213 | -52.629 | 0.594 | -2.511 | -4.98 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 248.163 | -52.639 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 248.188 | -52.643 | â | -1.81 | -4.84 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 248.175 | -52.64 | â | -2.0 | -4.35 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 248.158 | -52.638 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 248.158 | -52.638 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 248.17 | -52.64 | â | -2.06 | -2.5 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 248.17 | -52.62 | â | -1.85 | -3.18 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 248.188 | -52.643 | â | -1.85 | -4.87 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.42 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 288 | 0.131 | 1228 | 0.565 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.47 | 0.72 | â | 472 | 0.243 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.42 | 1.13 | â | 243 | â | 486 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1427(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.42 | 1.13 | â | 288 | 0.140 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.54 | 1.01 | 0.85 | 155 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.53 | 1.28 | â | 204 | 0.040 | 1228(1) | 0.57 | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 1.42 | 1.13 | â | 243 | 0.131 | 3525 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 427 | â | 86 | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.61 | 0.62 | â | 447 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.42 | 1.13 | â | 243 | 0.131 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.62 | 1.01 | â | 224 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.61 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Monteiro & Dias | 2019 | 1.54 | 1.19 | â | 271 | 0.022 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.57 | 1.06 | â | 172 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.61 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.61 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.03 | 0.61 | â | 427 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.03 | 0.61 | â | 427 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 447 | â | 1250(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 447 | â | 367 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 447 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.03 | 0.93 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.03 | 0.93 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.