Collinder 22

(NGC 744; MWSC 153; FSR 0574; FoF 669)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.91 UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 31.1 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.81 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Collinder 22 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 29.651 55.471 0.733 -1.865 -1.871 -25.861
Li et al. 2025 29.652 55.473 0.729 -1.864 -1.79 –
Almeida et al. 2025 29.66 55.475 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 29.642 55.481 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 29.642 55.481 0.721 -1.869 -1.883 -27.237
Cavallo et al. 2024 29.638 55.474 0.724 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 29.642 55.481 0.721 -1.869 -1.883 -27.237
Almeida et al. 2023 29.655 55.48 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 29.634 55.475 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 29.645 55.459 0.714 -1.837 -1.885 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 29.663 55.471 0.761 -1.876 -1.737 –
Rain et al. 2021 29.652 55.473 0.729 -1.864 -1.79 –
Dias et al. 2021 29.66 55.475 0.732 -1.885 -1.804 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 29.652 55.473 0.729 -1.864 -1.79 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 29.637 55.473 – -1.735 -1.431 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 29.652 55.473 0.729 -1.864 -1.79 –
Liu & Pang 2019 29.656 55.485 0.729 -1.872 -1.763 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 29.652 55.473 – – – -25.47
Bica et al. 2019 29.669 55.478 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 29.652 55.473 0.729 -1.864 -1.79 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 29.64 55.473 – 0.021 -1.35 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 29.634 55.475 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 29.637 55.473 – -2.97 -2.01 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 29.644 55.478 – -0.3 -3.92 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 29.644 55.478 – -0.81 -4.01 –
Piskunov et al. 2008 29.626 55.464 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 29.626 55.464 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 29.65 55.467 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 29.64 55.47 – -2.85 -3.15 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 29.65 55.47 – -1.8 -3.81 –
Dias et al. 2002 29.637 55.473 – -1.34 1.15 –
Dambis 1999 29.65 55.467 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.28 1.18 1.81 237 -0.094 280 0.53 0.0
Li et al. 2025 1.17 0.85 – 646 -0.247 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.26 1.12 – 182 – 244 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.142(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 832(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.44 1.22 – 257 0.180 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.30 0.91 1.81 344 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.26 1.27 – 220 -0.046 315(1) 0.53 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 237 – 601 – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 1.33 – – 162 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.31(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.32 1.18 – 174 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.26 1.12 – 182 0.019 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.37 0.84 – 135 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.32 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 479 -0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.32 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.32 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.25 1.17 – 176 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.38 1.18 – 237 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.38 1.18 – 237 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.38 1.18 – 237 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.21 1.18 – 257 – 56(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 1.21 1.18 – 257 – 15 – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.21 1.18 – 178 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.21 1.18 – 257 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.20 1.18 – – – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.21 1.19 – 177 – – – –
Dambis 1999 1.04 1.55 – 126 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️