Collinder 212
(NGC 3033; MWSC 1715; OCL 796; ESO 167 06; FoF 2090)
0.90
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
12.0 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 212 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 147.145 | -56.413 | 0.547 | -7.578 | 4.256 | 27.946 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 147.145 | -56.415 | 0.532 | -7.554 | 4.254 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 147.143 | -56.403 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 147.16 | -56.413 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 147.147 | -56.412 | 0.538 | -7.564 | 4.265 | 29.25 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 147.142 | -56.403 | 0.543 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 147.147 | -56.412 | 0.538 | -7.564 | 4.265 | 29.25 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 147.159 | -56.407 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 147.122 | -56.422 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 147.131 | -56.411 | 0.561 | -7.609 | 4.254 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 147.145 | -56.415 | 0.532 | -7.554 | 4.254 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 147.16 | -56.413 | 0.535 | -7.542 | 4.273 | 26.895 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 147.145 | -56.415 | 0.532 | -7.554 | 4.254 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 147.145 | -56.415 | 0.532 | -7.554 | 4.254 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 147.156 | -56.375 | 0.528 | -7.535 | 4.272 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 147.145 | -56.415 | â | â | â | 27.56 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 147.134 | -56.411 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 147.145 | -56.415 | 0.532 | -7.554 | 4.254 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 147.15 | -56.421 | â | -1.61 | 0.51 | 26.7 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 147.122 | -56.422 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 147.154 | -56.422 | â | -2.15 | 0.93 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 147.127 | -56.425 | â | -3.19 | 5.25 | 26.7 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 147.154 | -56.422 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 147.148 | -56.417 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 147.15 | -56.42 | â | 0.14 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 147.125 | -56.425 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 147.15 | -56.42 | â | -3.55 | 4.13 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 147.18 | -56.46 | â | -3.44 | 4.66 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 147.154 | -56.422 | â | -1.61 | 0.51 | 27.15 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.6 | 1.02 | 0.57 | 417 | 0.028 | 370 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.60 | 0.80 | â | 858 | -0.042 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.210(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.68 | 1.13 | â | 611 | â | 370 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 670(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.58 | 0.95 | â | 794 | 0.090 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.71 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 421 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.69 | 1.03 | â | 693 | 0.040 | 441(1) | 0.60 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 417 | â | 33 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.78(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.78 | 0.99 | â | 69 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.68 | 1.13 | â | 611 | 0.015 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.79 | 0.76 | â | 676 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.78 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 576 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.78 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.78 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.92 | 1.01 | â | 70 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.02 | 1.03 | â | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.02 | 1.03 | â | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.92 | â | â | 70 | â | 105 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.92 | 1.02 | â | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.92 | 1.02 | â | 69 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.92 | 1.02 | â | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.93 | 1.02 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.92 | 1.01 | â | 70 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.