Collinder 175
(VDBH 18; NGC 2533; MWSC 1432; OCL 695; vdBergh-Hagen 18; ESO 430 19; FSR 1338; FoF 387)
0.96
UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
12.8 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.82 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 175 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and age parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 121.766 | -29.865 | 0.344 | -3.179 | 5.066 | 36.69 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 121.773 | -29.872 | 0.329 | -3.189 | 5.041 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 121.766 | -29.869 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 121.769 | -29.876 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 121.769 | -29.86 | 0.35 | -3.185 | 5.074 | 40.576 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 121.766 | -29.869 | 0.347 | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2023 | 121.77 | -29.892 | 0.161 | -1.618 | 2.58 | 107.32 |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 121.769 | -29.86 | 0.35 | -3.185 | 5.074 | 40.576 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 121.765 | -29.869 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 121.772 | -29.877 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 121.772 | -29.869 | 0.352 | -3.188 | 5.055 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 121.773 | -29.872 | 0.329 | -3.189 | 5.041 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 121.769 | -29.876 | 0.334 | -3.178 | 5.039 | 34.631 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 121.773 | -29.872 | 0.329 | -3.189 | 5.041 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 121.773 | -29.872 | 0.329 | -3.189 | 5.041 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 121.758 | -29.869 | 0.322 | -3.214 | 5.011 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 121.773 | -29.872 | â | â | â | 35.21 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 121.757 | -29.889 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 121.773 | -29.872 | 0.329 | -3.189 | 5.041 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 121.77 | -29.883 | â | -0.76 | 2.38 | 35.2 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 121.772 | -29.877 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 121.767 | -29.883 | â | -1.62 | 2.02 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 121.777 | -29.88 | â | -0.76 | 2.38 | 35.2 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 121.767 | -29.883 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 121.75 | -29.9 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 121.767 | -29.883 | â | -1.62 | 2.02 | 35.22 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 729 | -0.117 | 562 | 0.69 | 1.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.55 | 0.96 | â | 1055 | -0.132 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.150(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.61 | 1.31 | â | 743 | â | 464 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1388(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.50 | 1.34 | â | 562 | -0.040 | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2023 | 6.92 | 1.50 | â | 501 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.56 | 0.83 | 1.10 | 729 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.53 | 1.04 | â | 1002 | -0.032 | 632(1) | 0.69 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 232 | â | 493 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.82(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.80 | 0.43 | â | 692 | â | â | â | 1 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.61 | 1.31 | â | 743 | -0.103 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.63 | 0.90 | â | 1047 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1230 | -0.500 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.38 | 0.15 | â | 752 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.96 | 1.42 | â | 232 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.96 | 1.42 | â | 232 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.70 | â | â | 692 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 3.38 | 0.16 | â | 759 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.70 | 0.43 | â | 692 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.