Collinder 162
(NGC 2453; MWSC 1340; OCL 670; ESO 493 12; MWSC 13409)
0.96
UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
24.9 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.81 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Collinder 162 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 116.896 | -27.194 | 0.22 | -2.331 | 3.444 | 85.072 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 116.894 | -27.194 | 0.205 | -2.336 | 3.414 | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 116.889 | -27.189 | β | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 116.902 | -27.196 | 0.219 | -2.338 | 3.434 | 85.517 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 116.894 | -27.194 | β | β | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 116.867 | -27.183 | 0.216 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 116.902 | -27.196 | 0.219 | -2.338 | 3.434 | 85.517 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 116.884 | -27.188 | β | β | β | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 116.897 | -27.191 | β | β | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 116.899 | -27.195 | 0.233 | -2.355 | 3.42 | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 116.894 | -27.194 | 0.205 | -2.336 | 3.414 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 116.889 | -27.189 | 0.22 | -2.331 | 3.403 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 116.894 | -27.194 | 0.205 | -2.336 | 3.414 | β |
| SΓ‘nchez et al. | 2020 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | -2.395 | 3.593 | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 116.894 | -27.194 | 0.205 | -2.336 | 3.414 | β |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 116.896 | -27.195 | 0.224 | -2.346 | 3.43 | 64.721 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 116.894 | -27.194 | β | β | β | 85.52 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 116.908 | -27.194 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 116.894 | -27.194 | 0.205 | -2.336 | 3.414 | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 116.895 | -27.194 | β | -0.696 | 2.775 | 33.9 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 116.897 | -27.191 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | -1.68 | 2.84 | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 116.902 | -27.193 | β | 2.99 | 8.5 | 33.9 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | -2.84 | 2.56 | 33.94 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 116.896 | -27.195 | β | β | β | β |
π‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999β | 3.84 | 1.4 | 2.25 | 27 | -0.151 | 674 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.45 | 1.50 | β | 34 | 0.054 | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.84 | 1.62 | β | 31 | β | 674 | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | β | β | β | β | β | 1553(1) | β | β |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | β | β | β | 25 | β | 720 | β | β |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.00 | 1.34 | β | 186 | 0.310 | β | β | β |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 4.06 | 1.22 | 2.25 | 122 | β | β | β | β |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 3.84 | 1.65 | β | 29 | -0.151 | 656(1) | 0.60 | β |
| Just et al. | 2023 | β | β | β | 73 | β | 98 | β | β |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 4.27(1) | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 4.27 | 1.36 | β | 15 | β | β | β | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.84 | 1.62 | β | 31 | -0.171 | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.49 | 1.26 | β | 25 | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.27 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 3.56 | 1.18 | β | 21 | -2.028 | β | β | β |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 4.27 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.27 | β | β | β | β | β | β | β |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.19 | 1.34 | β | 18 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.38 | 2.06 | β | 73 | β | β | β | β |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.38 | 2.06 | β | 73 | β | β | β | β |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.15 | β | β | 15 | β | β | β | β |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.15 | 1.40 | β | 15 | β | β | β | β |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.15 | 1.38 | β | 15 | β | β | β | β |
| Dambis | 1999 | 2.40 | 1.49 | β | 3 | β | β | β | β |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.